Unfair Attacks Begin in Earnest Against Judge John Roberts.

There have been a lot of "theories" about the recent Supreme Court nomination.

Theories about who would retire from the court. Theories about who the new nominee would be, with pundits claiming "inside information"--only to be proved wrong.

There have been theories about the nominee's politics, or how he would vote once on the court.

But one thing was never theoretical. Whoever President Bush named to the U.S. Supreme Court, pro-abortion groups were going to attack.

They were pre-programmed to do so. Like attack dogs let loose from the leash, they could only respond to whomever was nominated by viciously and relentlessly attacking their prey, in this case Federal Appeals Court Judge John Roberts.

Roberts, by all accounts, is a good and decent man of deep faith who loves his family and has a deep respect for his profession, the law.

So perhaps it's not surprising, knowing the modus operandi of our pro-abortion opponents over the years that the first attacks, or "concerns" as the media likes to call them, have come against Judge Roberts' family, his faith, and his view of the law.