AccessMyLibrary : Search Information that Libraries Trust AccessMyLibrary | News, Research, and Information that Libraries Trust

AccessMyLibrary    Browse    C    Canadian Parliamentary Review    Yukon.(Legislative Reports)

Yukon.(Legislative Reports)

Publication: Canadian Parliamentary Review

Publication Date: 22-SEP-05

Author: McCormick, Floyd
How to access the full article: Free access to all articles is available courtesy of your local library. To access the full article click the "See the full article" button below. You will need your US library barcode or password.

Bookmark this article

Print this article

Link to this article

Email this article

Digg It!

Add to del.icio.us

RSS

COPYRIGHT 2005 Canadian Parliamentary Association

The 2005 Spring Sitting of the Yukon Legislative Assembly began on March 24. Pursuant to Standing Order 74 the government introduced all the bills it wanted to see dealt with during this sitting by the fifth sitting day, April 4. Subsequently, pursuant to Standing Order 75, the three House leaders met to determine the length of the sitting. On April 6 the government House leader, Peter Jenkins (Klondike, Yukon Party) informed the Assembly that the House leaders could not reach agreement on the length of the sitting. As a result the Speaker, Ted Staffen, declared, pursuant to Standing Order 75(3), that the 2005 Spring Sitting would last 30 sitting days, the 30th sitting day to be May 17, 2004.

Government Legislation

Five government bills were introduced during this Sitting. These bills were:

* Bill No. 13, Third Appropriation Act, 2004-05

* Bill No. 14, Interim Supply Appropriation Act, 2005-06

* Bill No. 15, First Appropriation Act, 2005-06

* Bill No. 55, Miscellaneous Statute Law Amendment Act, 2005

* Bill No. 56, Dawson Municipal Governance Restoration Act

Bill No. 14 received assent on March 31; the other four bills received assent on May 17.

Question of Privilege

On the opening day of the Sitting Pat Duncan (Porter Creek South, Liberal) rose on a Question of Privilege. At issue was the government's divulging of budget-related information in advance of the presentation of the 2005-06 estimates in the Assembly. This, Ms. Duncan argued, constituted a contempt of the Assembly. Those familiar with the situation that developed in Ontario in 2003 will understand the issue presented in Yukon. In fact Ms. Duncan, in presenting her case to the Assembly, relied heavily on the argument presented...

Read the full article for free courtesy of your local library.


More Articles from Canadian Parliamentary Review
Quebec.(ASSEMBLEE NATIONALE)
September 22, 2005
CPA activities: the Canadian scene.(Commonwealth Parliamentary Associa...
September 22, 2005
Ian G. Imrie 1929 to 2005.(Brief Article)
September 22, 2005

What's on AccessMyLibrary?

32,394,273 articles
in the following categories:

Arts, Business, Consumer News, Culture & Society, Education, Government, Personal Interest, Health, News, Science & Technology


© 2008 Gale, a part of Cengage Learning  | All Rights Reserved | About this Service | About The Gale Group, a part of Cengage Learning
                                            Privacy Policy | Site Map | Content Licensing | Contact Us | Link to us
      Other Gale sites: Books & Authors | Goliath | MovieRetriever.com | WiseTo Social Issues