|
COPYRIGHT 2001 Society for the Advancement of Education
Unfounded scientific claims and theories can be traced to declining standards in science education.
SCIENCE is exciting partly because single discoveries can change the course of history. Think of the effects on human health and longevity of the discovery of antibiotics, the multifaceted impact on people's lives of the discovery of polymers, or the far-reaching importance of the Human Genome Project. However, most of the "revolutionary discoveries" made throughout history have turned out to be wrong.
Error is a regular part of science. That is why stories of new findings or discoveries, no matter where or how widely they are reported, should be regarded with healthy skepticism. The proper scientific approach to such claims involves a set of procedures called the scientific method, which requires the design of tests or experiments that can be repeated with the same results by anyone. These tests must also contain controls to ensure that the results are statistically significant.
Most erroneous conclusions by scientists are discovered during the process of publishing their research. Other scientists review submitted articles, often repeating any relevant tests or experiments and always evaluating the conclusions that have been drawn from them. So-called "junk science" bypasses this system of peer review. Presented directly to the public by people variously described as "experts" or "activists,"...
Read the full article for free courtesy of your local library.
|
Bookmark this article
Print this article
Link to this article
Email this article
Digg It!
Add to del.icio.us
RSS
