AccessMyLibrary provides FREE access to over 30 million articles from top publications available through your library.
Create a link to this page
Copy and paste this link tag into your Web page or blog:
It is no picnic, getting politicians to change their minds. A mixture of long hours, low pay and miserable expenses combine to make these individuals some of the most stubborn on the planet. So the unsung heroes who have sweated to get the Government to make a sharp U-turn on its stance on broadcast self-regulation, as reported on Campaign's front page this week, deserve a big pat on the back.
It is a truly remarkable achievement, marking the first time in decades that the combined might of various advertising industry acronyms (ISBA, the AA, the IPA, Asbof and so on) has managed to change the Government's mind on anything.
In fact, you could argue that the last time this happened to any notable degree was back in 1974 when the Advertising Standards Board of Finance was set up by Nigel Bogle's father, George, then the head of corporate affairs at Reed. In a few short months, Bogle senior persuaded the entire industry to pay a 0.1 per cent levy on all print, outdoor and cinema advertising. Apart from being an ingenious way of separating fundraising from the adjudications about ads, this money was used to give teeth to the Advertising Standards Authority. It saw off a government threat to enact legislation to control advertising.
Forty years on and the advertising landscape is much more complicated.
We no longer think in terms of screen viewing, but rather in terms of screen use, because so many more ...