AccessMyLibrary provides FREE access to over 30 million articles from top publications available through your library.
Create a link to this page
Copy and paste this link tag into your Web page or blog:
The American Catholic bishops met in Dallas on June 13-14 to consider the priest sex-abuse scandals. Their draft statement was all that was available to NR at press time, and, like many such statements, it was a mixed bag.
The Church decided to square itself with the state. The bishops pledged to report all accusations of the sex abuse of minors to the proper authorities, and to cooperate in investigating them. They also pledged to advise victims of their right to go to the cops. In essence, the Church promised to avoid behaving as a bullying and secretive in-group -- the very stuff of 19th-century nativist accusations -- and to render ununto Caesar what is Caesar's. For this reason, the bishops' draft was welcomed by prosecutors.
Did the bishops square themselves with the faithful, and with morality? At one point, their draft was naive. They want the ministerial status of priests who, in the past, abused only one minor, but who were not diagnosed as pedophiles, to be determined by a diocesan review board, with a majority of laymen. But how many molesters strike only once? La Rochefoucauld said that some women have no affairs, but none have just one. The same is true of child molesters.
The priest sex scandals implicate more than the wicked priests who are at fault. A selfish and blinkered hierarchy protected ...