AccessMyLibrary provides FREE access to over 30 million articles from top publications available through your library.

Volume counts in accuracy of mammogram interpretation.(Brief Article)

Women's Health Weekly

| April 04, 2002 | COPYRIGHT 2002 NewsRX. This material is published under license from the publisher through the Gale Group, Farmington Hills, Michigan.  All inquiries regarding rights should be directed to the Gale Group. (Hide copyright information)Copyright

2002 APR 4 - (NewsRx.com & NewsRx.net) -- Accurate diagnoses are directly related to the number of mammograms interpreted by a physician, according to a University of California San Francisco (UCSF) study published in the March 6, 2002, issue of the Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

The study was done to understand factors that affect quality in mammography. The participants were each given a set of 60 mammograms to interpret. From the U.S., 60 radiologists were divided into three groups: low-volume radiologists who read 100 or fewer mammograms per month, medium-volume radiologists who read 101-300 mammograms per month, and high-volume radiologists who read more than 300 mammograms per month. Joining them were 194 radiologists from the U.K., all high-volume readers. The results of two Swedish radiologists were used to compare high-volume results but not included in the data analyses.

Sensitivity, or the ability to detect cancer, was higher among the high-volume readers than medium- and low-volume readers. Furthermore, the U.K. high-volume readers were as accurate or more accurate than the high-volume U.S. readers were. The high accuracy achieved by the U.K. readers is significant, said the authors, because mammograms are far more likely to be followed by biopsies in the U.S. than in the U.K.

"These results suggest that higher biopsy rates are not necessary to find more cancers," said lead author Laura Esserman, MD, MBA, UCSF assistant professor in residence and director of the Carol Franc Buck Breast Care Center at UCSF.

Overall, high-volume readers were shown to have better accuracy - they found more cancers and more often were correct in identifying nonmalignant abnormalities. Low-volume U.S. readers identified fewer abnormalities than any of the high-volume readers. High-volume U.S. readers were 76% and U.K. readers 79% accurate; medium-volume U.S. readers were 70% and low-volume U.S. readers 65% accurate.

The conditions under which physicians provide mammography vary widely. In both Sweden and the U.K. mammography is performed at centralized centers. All of the participating U.K. radiologists were part of the National Screening Programme, which specifies a minimum annual reading volume for participation at 5000 mammograms per year. In the U.S. mammography is provided in a variety of settings, and the minimum reader volume, as set by the ...

Related articles from newspapers, magazines, journals, and more
Psychosocial correlates of mammography screening in older African American...
Magazine article from: Oncology Nursing Forum Farmer, Deborah Reddick, Bobbie D'Agostino, Ralph, Jr. Jackson, Sharon A. January 1, 2007 700+ words
...American women's adherence to annual mammography screening, including cancer fatalism, dispositional...factors associated with annual mammography screening. Design: Cross-sectional survey...examinations, benefits and barriers to mammography screening, and social support. Stepwise...
One in 2000 older women benefit from mammography screening.
Newspaper article from: HealthFacts December 1, 2006 700+ words
...lack of honesty in the mammography-screening information given to...2000 women* who go for mammography screening throughout a ten-year...diagnosis had they avoided mammography screening, will be treated unnecessarily...
Mammography Screening Does Not Save Lives.
Newspaper article from: HealthFacts Napoli, Maryann February 1, 2000 700+ words
Mammography screening hit the news again. This...two that found no benefit to mammography screening. One was conducted in Malmo...because it found no benefit to mammography screening) is the best documented...
Mammography screening: no proof yet that it saves lives.
Newspaper article from: HealthFacts August 1, 1995 700+ words
...Thirty years worth to be exact. Yet mammography screening continues to be the source of controversy...cancer will be unaffected by regular mammography screening and early detection. Long dominated...organizations has had the desired effect. Mammography screening now receives almost ...
An Equally Effective and Safer Alternative to Mammography Screening.
Newspaper article from: HealthFacts Napoli, Maryann October 1, 2000 700+ words
...unnecessary biopsy and breast removal. Mammography screening is a growth industry. It has moved...earlier finding of no benefit to mammography screening for women in their fifties. The...examination. "The addition of annual mammography screening to physical examination has no...
Provider Efforts to Increase Mammography Screening.
Magazine article from: Radiologic Technology LEGG, JEFFREY S. May 1, 2000 700+ words
...of the century.[9] However, mammography screening rates for the U.S. population...only one third received regular mammography screening.[10] Furthermore, Anderson...studies have examined barriers to mammography screening for the general U.S. population...
Mammography screening backed by task force.
Magazine article from: Contraceptive Technology Update August 1, 2002 700+ words
Mammography screening backed by task force Women...there was fair evidence that mammography screening every one to two years could...reaffirmed its support of mammography screening. It continues to recommend...
Mammography screening for women in their 40s: new analysis shows a benefit.
Newspaper article from: HealthFacts October 1, 1988 700+ words
MAMMOGRAPHY SCREENING FOR WOMEN IN THEIR 40s New Analysis Shows a Benefit Although mammography screening for women in their 40s has been...was reported among women whose mammography screening began after the age of 50. According...
For more facts and information, see all results
©2009 Gale, a part of Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.
About us | FAQs | Contact us | Privacy policy | Terms and conditions
Other Gale sites: Encyclopedia.com | HighBeam Research | Acquire Content | Books & Authors | Goliath | MovieRetriever | Smart QandA