AccessMyLibrary provides FREE access to over 30 million articles from top publications available through your library.

State legislation on reproductive health in 1990: What was proposed and enacted. (Special Report).

Readings on Induced Abortion, Volume 1: Politics and Policies

| January 01, 2000 | Sollom, Terry | COPYRIGHT 2000 Guttmacher Institute. This material is published under license from the publisher through the Gale Group, Farmington Hills, Michigan.  All inquiries regarding rights should be directed to the Gale Group. (Hide copyright information)Copyright

Introduction

In 1990, state legislatures across the United States considered more than 1,500 measures related to abortion, family planning, sterilization, teenage pregnancy, infertility, new reproductive technologies, maternal and child health care, sexually transmitted diseases (STDs), and AIDS. (*) Legislation carried over from 1989 comprised one-quarter of all bills up for consideration in 1990. Despite the large number of measures relating to reproductive health that were introduced, there was a general lack of action in the state legislatures in 1990, primarily a result of election-year distractions coupled with budgetary constraints. Only 120 bills actually were approved, and 20 of these were later vetoed. What follows is a summary of state legislative activity--and inactivity--in 1990.

Abortion

Abortion was one of the most important topics for proposed legislative action; 465 abortion-related bills were introduced by state legislators, three times as many as in 1989. The profusion undoubtedly stemmed from the 1989 U.S. Supreme Court decision in Webster v. Reproductive Health Services, which gave states more authority to restrict access to abortion services.

Although sweeping antiabortion proposals aimed at prohibiting most abortions were introduced in several legislatures for the first time in a dozen years, only a handful were seriously considered in 1990, and none became operational. Most legislatures that dealt with abortion at all chose to act in a now-familiar pattern, chipping away at the edges of abortion rights instead of attempting to ban abortion outright.

The anticipated effect of the Webster decision may have been dampened by election-year realities. Although some lawmakers wanted to act on Webster (or go even further, to provoke another Supreme Court review of legal abortion), others took heed of the November 1989 gubernatorial elections in New Jersey and Virginia, which were won by vocally prochoice candidates. In the end, state lawmakers generally kept to the familiar middle ground.

Most of the abortion-related bills received little floor action, and many legislatures adjourned without even taking them up at the committee level Nine antiabortion bills were passed--about the same number as in previous years--but only two of these became law, with five others vetoed, one enjoined by a federal court and another not enforced. In addition, three abortion rights bills were approved; two became law and one was vetoed.

Related articles from newspapers, magazines, journals, and more
Casey statement regarding Supreme Court decision. (Webster v. Reproductive...
Press release article from: PR Newswire July 3, 1989 700+ words
CASEY STATEMENT REGARDING SUPREME COURT DECISION HARRISBURG, Pa., July 3 /PRNewswire...the impact in Pennsylvania of the U.S. Supreme Court's decision today in the Webster v. Reproductive Health Services case: I intend to reserve comment...
The abortion furor. (impact of Supreme Court's Webster versus Reproductive...
Magazine article from: U.S. News & World Report Gest, Ted July 17, 1989 700+ words
...was he who would announce the Supreme Court's ruling in the last case of the 19 88-89 term, Webster v Reproductive Health Services, forces on both sides...is state legislators, not Supreme Court Justices, who should decide...
Supreme Court's abortion case to headline National Right to Life Committee news...
Press release article from: PR Newswire April 24, 1989 700+ words
/ N E W S C O N F E R E N C E / SUPREME COURT'S ABORTION CASE TO HEADLINE NATIONAL RIGHT...scheduled a news conference to discuss the Supreme Court case Webster vs. Reproductive Health Services, which will be heard on Wednesday...
Just what does Webster mean? (Webster v. Reproductive Health Services, Supreme...
Magazine article from: The Hastings Center Report Crigger, Bette-Jane January 1, 1990 700+ words
Just What Does Webster Mean? In drafting the abortion law recently considered by the U.S. Supreme Court in Webster v. Reproductive Health Services the Missouri state legislature may have wrought more than it realized. Although the statute...
Planned Parenthood issues statement on Supreme Court decision to review Webster...
Press release article from: PR Newswire January 9, 1989 700+ words
...STATEMENT ON SUPREME COURT DECISION TO REVIEW WEBSTER VS. REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH SERVICES WASHINGTON...on the U.S. Supreme Court decision to review Webster vs. Reproductive Health Services: While the U.S. Supreme Court's decision...
Planned Parenthood president issues statement in reaction to Supreme Court's...
Press release article from: PR Newswire July 3, 1989 700+ words
...STATEMENT IN REACTION TO SUPREME COURT'S WEBSTER DECISION...America, on the U.S. Supreme Court's decision in Webster v. Reproductive Health Services: This is a...to plead before th Supreme Court that Roe v. Wade be...
Specter comments on U.S. Supreme court decision on abortion issue. (Webster v....
Press release article from: PR Newswire July 3, 1989 700+ words
...SPECTER COMMENTS ON U.S. SUPREME COURT DECISION ON ABORTION...comment on the U.S. Supreme Court's decision in Webster v. Reproductive Health Services: This decision...on abortion when the Supreme Court takes up three new cases...
Roe on the brink. (Supreme Court's decision in Webster v. Reproductive Health...
Magazine article from: The Nation Pine, Rachel July 24, 1989 700+ words
In July 3, a majority of Supreme Court Justices turned what Justice Harry Blackmun...foundations of women's liberty and equality. The Supreme Court's decision in Webster v. Reproductive Health Services comprises five separate opinions...
For more facts and information, see all results
©2009 Gale, a part of Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.
About us | FAQs | Contact us | Privacy policy | Terms and conditions
Other Gale sites: Encyclopedia.com | HighBeam Research | Acquire Content | Books & Authors | Goliath | MovieRetriever | Smart QandA