SPOKEN PLEASURES AND DANGEROUS DESIRES: SEXUALITY, MARRIAGE, AND THE STATE IN RURAL SOUTHEASTERN CHINA.

Contemporary studies of rural China are notable for their lack of attention to sexuality. Most implicitly accept a prevailing view of rural society as ruled by conservative sexual mores and a procreative imperative, institutionalized through near-universal marriage rates.(1) When I began research in southeastern China's Huian county, I too assumed that given the prevalence of arranged marriages and patriarchal family organization, the expression of sexual desires and pleasures would be suppressed, if not inconceivable, among the women with whom I worked.(2) However, the rapidly changing nature of local marriage customs and sexual practices soon made apparent the limitations of understanding sexuality as a singular, unified discourse structured by compulsion. Although as a dominant institution, reproductive sexuality may appear unified and coherent, in practice sexual pleasures and desires are more diffuse and variable. Thus they reveal the work that must go into producing conjugal, procreative sexuality as the taken-for-granted arrangement of sexual acts and pleasures (Rich 1986).

In this article I examine the institutions and discourses in rural China that have produced a dominant construction of sexuality as marital and reproductive in orientation.(3) In particular, I show how the vision of sexuality promoted through local marriage customs converges with the reproductive focus of state population policies to create an official discourse of "reprosexuality," which privileges reproduction over pleasure, and conjugal sexual behavior over non-marital (Warner 1991).(4) At the same time, I also argue that despite the institutional power of this discourse, it cannot fully determine the sexual practices of young women and men in rural Huian, or the meanings attributed to such practices. The greater opportunities and flexibility offered by a market economy, together with the unintended consequences of the state's population control policies, enable a proliferation of sexual desires, behaviors, and pleasures that exceed the bounds of a normative, conjugal model of sexuality.

This excess, however, does not reflect the simple liberation of a natural sexuality that has long been repressed by patriarchal societal and state forces. Foucault's negation of the repressive hypothesis has shown us how sexuality operates as a particular construction of knowledges, practices, and desires both produced by and productive of configurations of power. Rather than "a kind of natural given which power tries to hold in check, or ... an obscure domain which knowledge tries gradually to uncover," sexuality, for Foucault

 
   is the name that can be given to a historical construct, ... a great 
   surface network in which the stimulation of bodies, the intensification of 
   pleasures, the incitement to discourse, the formation of special 
   knowledges, the strengthening of controls and resistances, are linked to 
   one another in accordance with a few major strategies of knowledge and 
   power. (Foucault 1978:105-106) 

By de-naturalizing (one might say de-biologizing) sexuality, Foucault rejects a vision of sexuality as a basic physiological need kept in check by an array of social, political, and economic forces. Instead, he argues that sexuality emerged as a historical product of bourgeois, capitalist society.

David Halperin (1993), in his commentary on the comparatively short history of this particular understanding of sexuality, provides a compelling model for analyzing sexual practices in a more diverse array of contexts than the Euro-American world of the past three centuries. He documents how sexual desires in ancient Greece were sparked not by gendered object choice, but by the citizen/non-citizen status relationship around which Greek society was organized. Refuting the widespread applicability of a concept of "sexuality" defined by identity, Halperin instead calls for analyses of what he terms "the cultural poetics of desire," or, in other words, "the processes whereby sexual desires are constructed, mass-produced, and distributed among the various members of human living-groups" (1993: 426).

By shifting analytic attention away from sexual identity, Halperin illustrates the important role of sociopolitical institutions and cultural values in making particular sexual configurations culturally intelligible to social actors. Similarly, I demonstrate how in eastern Huian, the convergence of state population policies with a distinctive local marriage system has created a prevailing discourse of reprosexuality that shapes sexual desires and practices in specific ways. Yet I also argue that this configuration fails to encompass all forms of sexual expression, thereby suggesting that Halperin's notion of "cultural poetics" perhaps goes too far in assuming recognized conventions of feeling and behavior subscribed to by all members of a society.