AccessMyLibrary provides FREE access to over 30 million articles from top publications available through your library.
Create a link to this page
Copy and paste this link tag into your Web page or blog:
1. Introduction
Social capital proponents, such as Robert Putnam (1993b), claim communities with larger stocks of horizontal social capital exhibit better development outcomes. If social capital promotes economic development and effective governance then a logical next question is, "Can social capital be increased in places where it is low?" Putnam's (1993a) study of Italy provides little evidence for the constructability of social capital. A major state intervention (in creating a system of regional government) did little to promote social capital formation in areas where it was weak. Durkheim would agree, social structure changes very slowly and development interventions are unlikely to yield much impact.
For many development practitioners, and a few theorists, higher hopes are pinned on the prospects for social capital building and its impact on development outcomes in the community. A few theorists insist on the possibility of building social capital where it is weak and point to the role of formal governmental institutions (Evans, 1996; Skocpol, 1996). They are joined by community development practitioners who attempt to show explicitly what role the state might play in social capital construction (Potapchuck et al., 1997).
This paper explores the constructability of social capital and specifically the role formal state supported institutions can play in structuring community level interventions to build social capital. For a fuller discussion of these issues see (Warner, 1999).
2. Can social capital be built?