AccessMyLibrary provides FREE access to over 30 million articles from top publications available through your library.
Create a link to this page
Copy and paste this link tag into your Web page or blog:
How smitten are conservatives with George W. Bush? One famously unsparing activist, Paul Weyrich, recently told the New York Times, "I personally love this president." Conservatives have been quite happy with the administration's center-right course, rooting for it in its dealings with a closely divided Congress. But several trouble spots are developing. Conservatives are beginning to express concerns about the administration on taxes, education, the environment, and the president's faith-based initiative.
The concerns about Bush's tax-cut proposal are both tactical and substantive. Since he unveiled his tax-cut program on the campaign trail, the surplus has grown and the economy has weakened. Conservatives in the House have responded to these developments by proposing a larger package that takes effect faster. But Bush has said the tax cut shouldn't get any bigger, and Treasury secretary Paul O'Neill has even joked that Bush might fire him if Congress passes deeper tax cuts. So with a bigger tax bill in the House ruled out, the president is left negotiating with senators who want a smaller one. The plan can only shrink. Conservative discontent has mainly been confined to the op-ed pages and the Hill, but it could spread to the grass roots. Already, Rush Limbaugh has warned, "They are watering down this cut to the point it isn't a cut." Conservatives may grow more restive when they hear that the administration has signaled that it would accept less than a full repeal of the death tax, despite the fact that Congress comfortably passed a repeal in its last session.
Pro-family activists and their supporters in Congress have principled objections to Bush's version of marriage-penalty relief, which provides a 10 percent deduction for two-earner couples, but no relief for single-earner families. Phyllis Schlafly labels the result a "homemaker penalty," courtesy of the Bush White House. Although Congress last year approved a bill extending relief to all married couples, the administration continues to insist on its own version. A top conservative aide in the House sees a fight ahead-one the White House will lose. "We don't have a choice, we have to do what we did last year," he explains. The ultimate size and shape of this year's inevitable tax cut will depend on how Bush defines victory; conservatives hope they don't end up feeling defeated.
The same is true on education reform: When the president unveiled his proposal, following a flurry of photo ops with Democratic lawmakers, it looked as if he were mining the most promising vein for bipartisan cooperation. It appeared that lots of new spending might buy Democratic support for some conservative actions, such as creating limited voucher programs and giving states flexibility in how they spend education grants. But the landscape has changed in just a few short weeks. In what is always a dismaying sign for conservatives, the Senate education panel unanimously approved some provisions of the president's plan, but postponed the most controversial reforms for consideration by the entire Senate. Conservative reformers expect the final Senate product to be a bill that Ted Kennedy will like.
Meanwhile, in the House, Republicans are insisting that the White House not abandon the choice and flexibility reforms. They also ...