AccessMyLibrary provides FREE access to over 30 million articles from top publications available through your library.
Create a link to this page
Copy and paste this link tag into your Web page or blog:
NEW YORK, JANUARY 5
The hearings in the matter of John Ashcroft for attorney general will be, indeed have already been, one more immersion in the recurrent pesthole of American politics, the liberal gangbang of choice conservative figures. They did it to Barry Goldwater, and succeeded; tried to do it to Ronald Reagan, but were overwhelmed. They did it to Clarence Thomas, failed formally (he sits on the Supreme Court), but gave rise to an ongoing national enterprise (EMILY's List: Persecute anybody who voted to confirm Thomas). The Wall Street Journal records that representatives have met to plot the defamation of Ashcroft. Among them, the Leadership Conference on Civil Rights, the AFL-CIO, the National Organization for Women, the American Civil Liberties Union, and, of course, People for the American Way, which is, we pause to remark, an un-American organization.
What would you rather be called, a racist, or a liar? Ashcroft is called both. And by people who think of themselves as fussy in the matter of defamation. Two columnists in the New York Times have opined using this language, one of them (Anthony Lewis) in as many words: Ashcroft is a "liar."
Now the dictionary (American Heritage) qualifies you as a liar if you say something "meant to deceive or give a false impression." It could be said, under this definition that is at once latitudinarian and comprehensive, that every politician since Coriolanus is a liar. Yet the word remains near uniquely savage. If John Ashcroft is a liar in the sense that, oh, FDR was a liar (he was going to balance the budget and keep us out of war), forget it and aim your resentment at the fouling of the language by such as Mr. Lewis. If, on the other hand, Mr. Ashcroft deserves to be called a liar, then send him not to the Justice Department, but packing, back to Missouri.
What concretely will they argue?
1) That he opposes abortion (so did Mother Teresa). From which it follows that 2) he will call to the favorable attention of ...
Source: HighBeam Research, On the Right - The Perils of Being John Ashcroft.