AccessMyLibrary provides FREE access to millions of articles from top publications available through your library.

Rescue thrombolysis for failure of primary thrombolysis cannot be justified.

British Medical Journal

| January 23, 1999 | Sutton, A G C | COPYRIGHT 2003 British Medical Association. (Hide copyright information)Copyright

EDITOR--Drenth et al suggest a policy of repeat thrombolysis if initial thrombolysis fails,[1] but their arguments are flawed.

Firstly, they state that a routine policy of rescue angioplasty cannot be justified from a review of the literature, although they fail to mention that the trial by Ellis et al showed a significant reduction in the incidence of death or severe heart failure in the rescue angioplasty group compared with the conservative group.[2]

Secondly, there are far fewer published data from randomised trials comparing the use of rescue thrombolysis with conservative treatment, yet the authors claim that these data support their current practice. …

Related articles from newspapers, magazines, journals, and more
©2013 Gale, a part of Cengage Learning. All rights reserved. Contact us | Privacy policy | Terms and conditions

The AccessMyLibrary advertising network includes: womensforum.com GlamFamily