AccessMyLibrary provides FREE access to millions of articles from top publications available through your library.
Create a link to this page
Copy and paste this link tag into your Web page or blog:
EDITOR--Drenth et al suggest a policy of repeat thrombolysis if initial thrombolysis fails,[1] but their arguments are flawed.
Firstly, they state that a routine policy of rescue angioplasty cannot be justified from a review of the literature, although they fail to mention that the trial by Ellis et al showed a significant reduction in the incidence of death or severe heart failure in the rescue angioplasty group compared with the conservative group.[2]
Secondly, there are far fewer published data from randomised trials comparing the use of rescue thrombolysis with conservative treatment, yet the authors claim that these data support their current practice. …