AccessMyLibrary provides FREE access to millions of articles from top publications available through your library.

The technology innovation program.(Report)

Congressional Research Service (CRS) Reports and Issue Briefs

| June 01, 2010 | Schacht, Wendy H. | COPYRIGHT 2002 Congressional Research Service (CRS) Reports and Issue Briefs. (Hide copyright information)Copyright
 Contents  Introduction Funding Background A Different Approach Issues and Observations 

June 14, 2010

Summary

The Technology Innovation Program (TIP) at the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) was established in 2007 to replace the Advanced Technology Program (ATP). This effort is designed "to support, promote, and accelerate innovation in the United States through high-risk, high-reward research in areas of critical national need," according to the authorizing legislation. Grants are provided to small and medium-sized firms for individual projects or joint ventures with other research organizations.

While similar to the Advanced Technology Program in the promotion of R&D that is expected to be of broad-based economic benefit to the nation, TIP appears to have been structured to avoid what was seen as government funding of large firms that opponents argued did not necessarily need federal support for research. The committee report to accompany H.R. 1868, part of which was incorporated into the final legislation, stated that TIP replaces ATP in consideration of a changing global innovation environment focusing on small and medium-sized companies. The design of the program also "acknowledges the important role universities play in the innovation cycle by allowing universities to fully participate in the program."

The elimination of ATP and the creation of TIP have renewed the debate over the role of the federal government in promoting commercial technology development. In arguing for less direct federal involvement, advocates of this approach believe that the market is superior to government in deciding technologies worthy of investment. Mechanisms that enhance the market's opportunities and abilities to make such choices are preferred. It is suggested that agency discretion in selecting one technology over another can lead to political intrusion and industry dependency. On the other hand, supporters of direct methods argue that it is important to focus on those technologies that have the greatest promise as determined by industry and supported by matching funds from the private sector. They assert that the government can serve as a catalyst for cooperation. As the 111th Congress continues to make budget decisions, the discussion may serve to redefine thinking about governmental efforts in facilitating technological advancement in the private sector.

Introduction

The Technology Innovation Program (TIP) at the National …

Related articles from newspapers, magazines, journals, and more
The Technology Innovation Program.(Congressional Research Service)(Report)
Newspaper article from: Congressional Research Service (CRS) Reports and Issue Briefs Schacht, Wendy H. March 1, 2009 700+ words
Technology transfer: use of federally funded research and development.(CRS...
Newspaper article from: Congressional Research Service (CRS) Reports and Issue Briefs Schacht, Wendy H. August 1, 2008 700+ words
Industrial competitiveness and technological advancement: debate over...
Newspaper article from: Congressional Research Service (CRS) Reports and Issue Briefs Schacht, Wendy H. August 1, 2008 700+ words
SATA HDD combines 320 GB capacity and power efficiency.(Fujitsu Combines...
Magazine article from: Product News Network March 27, 2008 700+ words
The America COMPETES Act and the FY2009 budget.(CRS Report for Congress)
Newspaper article from: Congressional Research Service (CRS) Reports and Issue Briefs Stine, Deborah D. October 1, 2008 700+ words
©2013 Gale, a part of Cengage Learning. All rights reserved. Contact us | Privacy policy | Terms and conditions

The AccessMyLibrary advertising network includes: womensforum.com GlamFamily