AccessMyLibrary provides FREE access to millions of articles from top publications available through your library.

Four reasons why James Cameron mustn't re-release Avatar.

Europe Intelligence Wire

| March 17, 2010 | COPYRIGHT 2003 Financial Times Ltd. (Hide copyright information)Copyright

(From Guardian Unlimited)

The assorted voting members of the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences must be feeling pretty remorseful at the moment. Thanks to their collective decision that The Hurt Locker is better than Avatar, James Cameron has chosen to take his revenge by unleashing hell on the world.

That's assuming that your definition of hell involves the theatrical release of an extended version of Avatar later this year, obviously. And if it doesn't, it should. I can understand Cameron's decision to give Titanic a 3D makeover -- since I was a teenager I've longed to see a man's head bounce off the propeller of a sinking ocean-liner in all three …

Related articles from newspapers, magazines, journals, and more
Can James Cameron Save Avatar Sequels from Matrix Meltdown?
News wire article from: Europe Intelligence Wire September 12, 2012 700+ words
Avatar 2 and 3 to return James Cameron to Pandora.
News wire article from: Europe Intelligence Wire October 27, 2010 700+ words
James Cameron to Film Three Avatar Sequels Back to Back
News wire article from: Europe Intelligence Wire June 27, 2012 700+ words
Where should James Cameron take Avatar next?
News wire article from: Europe Intelligence Wire January 7, 2010 700+ words
Avatar: a first review of footage from James Cameron's 3D space opera.
News wire article from: Europe Intelligence Wire August 21, 2009 700+ words
©2013 Gale, a part of Cengage Learning. All rights reserved. Contact us | Privacy policy | Terms and conditions

The AccessMyLibrary advertising network includes: womensforum.com GlamFamily