AccessMyLibrary provides FREE access to millions of articles from top publications available through your library.

Factors affecting uptake of antenatal HIV testing in London: results of a multicentre study.

British Medical Journal

| January 24, 1998 | Gibb, Diana M.; MacDonagh, Sandra E.; Gupta, Ramyani; Tookey, Pat A.; Peckham, Catherine S.; Ades, A.E. | COPYRIGHT 2003 British Medical Association. (Hide copyright information)Copyright

Introduction

Antiretroviral therapy[1] and avoidance of breastfeeding' can reduce the risk of mother to child transmission of HIV from 25-30% to 5-8%.[3 4] In the United Kingdom, women who know their HIV status are increasingly taking up these interventions.[5] Despite national guidelines recommending that antenatal HIV testing should be offered to all women in areas of higher prevalence such as London,[6] in 1995 only 13 (39%) of the 33 London maternity units had a policy of offering testing to all pregnant women.[7] Nationally, detection of previously undiagnosed HIV infection in pregnancy has remained below 10%.[8] Ibis study reports the offer and uptake of antenatal HIV testing in six London maternity units and examines how these are related to maternal risk of exposure to HIV and screening practices.

Methods

Six inner London maternity units with high HIV seroprevalence participated in the study. All had a "universal offer" policy, but implementation varied between units (see table 1). Within each unit, data on demographic and obstetric factors, including risk factors for HIV infection, were collected by questionnaire over a 12 month period during 1995 and 1996. Data on the number of women booking for antenatal care from each unit were collected and checked with laboratory data on number of samples sent for rubella antibody testing.

Data were analysed with univariate and multivariate logistic regression models controlling for hospital, risk category, ethnic group, place of booking interview, age, whether HIV was discussed and testing offered, and the interaction between hospital and risk category. Risk category included data on risks disclosed during the antenatal interview, and the categories "black African" and "partner black African," derived from self report of ethnic group and country of birth. The category "exposed in Africa" included any women born in Africa and those who gave their ethnic group as black African.

Results

One unit was excluded from the analysis (unit F) because only 17% of …

Related articles from newspapers, magazines, journals, and more
Does uptake of antenatal HIV testing depend on the individual midwife? Cross...
Magazine article from: British Medical Journal Jones, Simon Sadler, Tonya Low, Nicola Blott, Maggie Welch, Jan January 24, 1998 700+ words
Antenatal HIV testing: current problems, future solutions: survey of uptake...
Magazine article from: British Medical Journal Duffy, Teresa A. Wolfe, Charles D.A. Varden, Claire Kennedy, Jane Chrystie, Ian L. Banatvala, Jangu E. January 24, 1998 700+ words
Uptake and acceptability of antenatal HIV testing: randomised controlled...
Magazine article from: British Medical Journal Simpson, Wendy M. Johnstone, Frank D. Boyd, Fiona M. Goldberg, David J. Hart, Graham J. Prescott, Robin J. January 24, 1998 700+ words
Descriptive survey of antenatal HIV testing in London: policy, uptake, and...
Magazine article from: British Medical Journal MacDonagh, Sandra E. Masters, Janet Helps, Barbara A. Tookey, Pat A. Ades, A.E. Gibb, Diana M. August 31, 1996 700+ words
Antenatal HIV testing: what now?(Editorial)
Magazine article from: British Medical Journal Noone, Ahilya Goldberg, David May 17, 1997 700+ words
©2013 Gale, a part of Cengage Learning. All rights reserved. Contact us | Privacy policy | Terms and conditions

The AccessMyLibrary advertising network includes: womensforum.com GlamFamily