AccessMyLibrary provides FREE access to over 30 million articles from top publications available through your library.
Create a link to this page
Copy and paste this link tag into your Web page or blog:
The same day tic signed into law the omnibus spending bill containing $7.7 billion in earmarked projects, President Barack Obama favorably cited the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act as an example of legislation devoid of any congressional earmarks. But the earmark-less $787 billion "stimulus" plan that he championed is not devoid of new spending, which accounts for more than two-thirds of the bill's total cost.
There were also no earmarks in the congressional measure authorizing a second round of $350 billion in TARP funding to bail out major financial institutions. Like the stimulus legislation, a dearth of earmarks did not mean a dearth of spending.
Earmarks are generally associated with "pork-barrel" spending. Appropriations that are earmarked can be wasteful, excessive, and unconstitutional--and when they are, Congress should vote against the spending. However, as the stimulus and TARP legislation surely demonstrate, appropriations that are not earmarked can also be wasteful, excessive, and unconstitutional.
When Congress appropriates money in a huge lump sum with out any earmarks, ...