AccessMyLibrary provides FREE access to over 30 million articles from top publications available through your library.
Create a link to this page
Copy and paste this link tag into your Web page or blog:
INTRODUCTION
Linkages, integration, synergy, competitive advantage, distinctive competence, and interdependence - if these words sound familiar, they should: They represent the strategic battle cry of management in the competitive environment of the 1990s. The literature continually reveals the need for integrating corporate, business, and functional strategies(1) to achieve a synergistic effect. To obtain synergy among the various levels of strategic planning calls for the alignment of efforts at all levels.
The literature addressing the integration issue is, for the most part, conceptual and descriptive in nature. The focus of the literature has been in the strategy formulation area and on methods for achieving implementation. Many of the proposed implementation methods target the impact of organizational structure, communication channels, or planning issues. Still others indicate how to incorporate various organizational levels in the strategic planning framework. The frameworks are sound, but lack substance in offering specific direction or guidelines. There is an absence of frameworks that are prescriptive and proactive in scope.
Models remain relatively descriptive due to the diversity inherent in each specific strategic situation. To develop a prescriptive, proactive model first requires the identification of a common strategic denominator that can be applied across a wide variety of strategic scenarios. This article presents the development of an integrated framework using the product life cycle (PLC) concept as the common denominator. The model will be referred to as the Integrated Product Life Cycle (IPLC) model.
STATEMENT OF PURPOSE