AccessMyLibrary provides FREE access to over 30 million articles from top publications available through your library.
Create a link to this page
Copy and paste this link tag into your Web page or blog:
Should the President of Sudan, the notorious Omar Al-Bashir, go to jail? Last week the International Criminal Court at The Hague issued a warrant to arrest the Sudanese president for his role in the death of 300,000 people and the displacement of millions more during the six-year conflict in Darfur. It is the first time the court has charged a sitting head of state, and given the vile crimes committed in Darfur, a conviction would at last give the victims and their families some measure of justice.
But policymakers ought to think twice before following through on the ICC's decision. While the warrant sends a clear signal to Bashir and others with blood on their hands that justice will be served, it has already halted further progress at the Darfur peace talks that have been underway in Qatar between Khartoum and the most powerful rebel group, the Justice and Equality Movement. While these talks have to date yielded little more than a good-will agreement to end the conflict, it appears that the arrest warrant for Bashir has shattered even these fragile gains. In the wake of the ICC warrant, the rebel group announced it is pulling back from further negotiations. Bashir may now also see little to gain from them.
The warrant could also endanger the United Nations peacekeepers and humanitarian workers who have done so much to reduce the suffering in the region. Although the horrors continue in Darfur, they are nowhere near the level that existed before they were allowed to operate. But soon after the ICC ruling, Sudan announced that it was expelling many of the aid groups, which will clearly jeopardize the delivery of much-needed humanitarian assistance. The U.N. peacekeepers could be next.
Finally, and most ominously, the warrant could undermine the 2005 Comprehensive Peace Agreement (CPA) between northern and southern Sudan, which brought to an end a civil war that lasted 20 years and cost more than 2 million lives. This landmark deal is fraying badly already. Elections scheduled for 2009 are behind schedule, and implementation of wealth- and power-sharing provisions have stalled. Bashir fought many in his party to sign the peace agreement, and leaders in the south now worry that the indictment will jeopardize the 2011 referendum that would give it the right to secede from Sudan. The collapse of the agreement would almost certainly lead to renewed conflict between north and south, with fragmentation and bloodshed that could rival the violence of Darfur at its worst.
So what to do? ...