AccessMyLibrary provides FREE access to over 30 million articles from top publications available through your library.
Create a link to this page
Copy and paste this link tag into your Web page or blog:
THERE'S AN AGE-OLD CHOICE in IT--whether to adopt a "best of breed" strategy for the power and flexibility it can bring, or go with a single vendor for accountability and simplicity. J. Craig Venter Institute Inc. (JCVI) believes in best of breed. The genomic research company runs Linux, Unix, Windows and Mac OS in its data center. For storage, it draws on technology from EMC, Net App, Isilon, Data Domain and Symantec.
[ILLUSTRATION OMITTED]
[ILLUSTRATION OMITTED]
"It's quite a heterogeneous environment," says computer systems manager Eddy Navarro. "Thankfully, we have a very talented staff here."
And a talented staff was just what was needed to master the many flavors of storage virtualization, which can make multiple physical disks look like one big storage pool. Like JCVI, many organizations are enjoying the lower costs and added flexibility of storage virtualization. But the benefits can come with some headaches. Here, five IT managers who have led successful storage virtualization projects offer advice for relieving the pain.
HEADACHE 1:
Managing Multiple Vendors
For several years, JCVI had employed software-based virtualization in the form of Red Hat's Linux Logical Volume Manager, which allows logical partitions to span multiple disk drives. More recently, the company added hardware based virtualization in the form of NetApp's V Series system to create a single virtual pool of storage consisting of EMC Symmetrix disks and legacy Clarion disks.
The Clarion drives, which came into the data center from a corporate merger, were being poorly utilized, Navarro says. Now, the NetApp V system reformats data going to and from the EMC disks, "and then you carry on just as if it's another NetApp system," Navarro says. That enabled JCVI to wring better performance from the legacy disks.
Each of JCVI's vendors makes its own unique contribution to a powerful and cost-effective storage architecture, Navarro says. But the diversity comes at a cost. "When you are talking about multiple vendors' hardware--and they compete …