AccessMyLibrary provides FREE access to over 30 million articles from top publications available through your library.
Create a link to this page
Copy and paste this link tag into your Web page or blog:
IF you listen to critics, George W. Bush's tax cuts have dramatically changed the fairness of the U.S. federal income tax: "The Bush tax cuts give those who earn over $1 million a tax cut nearly 160 times greater than that received by middle-income Americans." Such rhetoric suggests that a big share of the tax burden has been passed on to the little guy.
Proponents of the cuts, of course, support them not because they are a giveaway to the rich, but because lower marginal tax rates improve the overall working of the economy, enhancing the welfare of people at the top and the bottom. And there is a bonus for a revenue-hungry government: When tax rates are lower, individuals have more incentive to work and less incentive to avoid taxes. That explains why the revenue cost of reduced marginal rates is much smaller than the static scorers in Washington let on.
According to the negative (Obama) view, when Bush's tax cuts took effect, the share of income taxes paid by the wealthiest Americans should have declined. The rich, in this scenario, benefited from the senseless giveaway, putting a greater and greater proportion of the tax burden on the poor. Under the positive view, by contrast, the share of income taxes paid by the wealthiest Americans might increase even when you cut their tax rates, since they will work harder and reduce their ...
Source: HighBeam Research, The rich, soaked.(on President George W. Bush's tax policy)