AccessMyLibrary provides FREE access to over 30 million articles from top publications available through your library.
Create a link to this page
Copy and paste this link tag into your Web page or blog:
Byline: Rana Foroohar
IF YOU HAVE ANY DOUBT ABOUT THE LONG-TERM IMPLICATIONS OF HUNGER, CONSIDER the following statistic. In North Korea, where food shortages and famine have been endemic for years, the average adolescent is 18 centimeters shorter than his counterpart in South Korea. Hunger has created a lost generation. Today, as food prices spiral out of control, the worry is that millions more of the world's poorest will also be lost to its ravages. Over the past few months, there have been food-related riots in 22 countries.
One government (Haiti) has fallen because of them. Others are under pressure.
It all underscores the incredibly political nature of food. Fuel prices have risen farther and faster than agricultural commodities over the past few years, and the $1 trillion subprime mess dwarfs the food crisis in terms of economic impact. But you don't eat oil or stocks. "Food is a radically different threat, because it affects so many of the world's poor so profoundly," says Erwann Michel-Kerjan, managing director of the Risk Management and Decision Processes Center at the Wharton School. Food is also, he notes, "an amplifier" of many other kinds of risk, particularly political risk, and its effects are traveling more rapidly because of the increasing interconnectedness of the world.
Those who would try to predict where the current situation is headed would do well to consider food crises of the past. The last major run-up in food prices (1974 to 1975) bears a number of similarities to today. Rising oil prices made farming ...