AccessMyLibrary provides FREE access to over 30 million articles from top publications available through your library.
Create a link to this page
Copy and paste this link tag into your Web page or blog:
NEW YORK, JANUARY 19
In August, President Bush approved a new U.S. policy on space exploration and on the military and commercial uses of space. The White House announced that the United States would not agree to any arrangements that would restrict our own ventures into space.
This was not surprising. We spoke as the superpower that had left behind, but not immobilized, what was once the other superpower, the Soviet Union. Russia acknowledges no bounds on its strategic intentions in space, but Russia is more worried right now about cornflakes at breakfast than about the old indulgences of superpowers.
What was important in the document, released in October, was less the announcement that we would continue energetic uses of space than the accompanying announcement that other nations' activities must be restricted. The White House affirmed that the U.S. would "dissuade or deter others from either impeding [U.S.] rights or developing capabilities intended to do so." In fact, we would "deny, if necessary, adversaries the use of space capabilities hostile to U.S. national interests."
Today's headline is that China has soared into space. What it accomplished was to reach with a land-based missile an old Chinese weather satellite and blow it to smithereens--literally: There are 300,000 bits of it cavorting in space, which will take a quarter century to clean up. And orbiting debris was one of the dangers specifically addressed in the Bush administration's new policy.
Two parts of the story attract attention. The first is that we were taken by surprise. It is embarrassing to proclaim, in October, that the U.S. will "dissuade" any power that seeks military leverage in space, and then to confront, in January, evidence that exactly what we set out to prevent has happened. Why was it beyond U.S. intelligence to foresee Chinese progress along these lines? ...
Source: HighBeam Research, China up there.(on the right)