AccessMyLibrary provides FREE access to over 30 million articles from top publications available through your library.

Back to tax and spend.(PUBLIC POLICY II)

National Review

| June 11, 2007 | COPYRIGHT 2007 National Review, Inc. This material is published under license from the publisher through the Gale Group, Farmington Hills, Michigan.  All inquiries regarding rights should be directed to the Gale Group. (Hide copyright information)Copyright

WITHOUT much notice, the Democrats have passed a budget resolution that would allow most of the Bush tax cuts to expire at the end of 2010. Allowing tax rates to snap back to their former levels would constitute the largest tax increase in American history.

The Democrats argue that their budget does not necessarily assume tax increases, although it projects higher spending and budget surpluses that couldn't be accomplished any other way. As Brian Riedl of the Heritage Foundation has noted, the Democrats' budget assumes that revenues will be $721 billion higher than the Congressional Budget Office estimates. That's suspiciously close to the amount of money taxpayers are projected to save if the Bush tax cuts remain in place.

In fact, if one assumes that the Democrats preserve marriage-penalty relief, the child-tax-credit expansion, and the 10 percent income-tax bracket--the cuts they are inclined to keep--then the difference between the two amounts is erased. What's left is a plan to allow the majority of the Bush tax cuts to expire. That means raising taxes on dividends and capital gains, which have become a significant source of income for seniors. It also means big tax hikes for middle-class families.

When the Democrats say their budget doesn't include "tax increases," they're simply playing with words. When confronted with the plain fact that, under their budget, tax rates will be higher in 2011 than they were the year before, they argue that allowing a tax cut to expire is not the same as raising taxes. This sophistry might shield them from immediate political consequences--most people, after all, aren't paying close attention to a non-binding budget document that projects tax increases four years into the future. But it will be interesting to see how far that explanation gets them once higher tax rates force Americans to start cutting into their own budgets.

The Democrats' budget increases discretionary spending by 9 percent, setting aside more money for hundreds of duplicative and ineffective government programs and allowing for the reauthorization of corporate welfare such as the Advanced Technology Program and massively wasteful farm programs. Through these programs, the federal government directly ...

Related articles from newspapers, magazines, journals, and more
Democrats vying on Social Security.(PAGE ONE)
Newspaper article from: The Washington Times February 9, 2005 700+ words
...Maryland Democrat, says that...but that Democrats know that Social Security's future...Reid, Nevada Democrat, and House...California Democrat, say Democrats are willing...Bush about Social Security reform. But...
The Social Security Card; GOP Worries as Democrats Play On Voters' Fear of Cuts
Newspaper article from: The Washington Post Eric Pianin November 4, 1994 700+ words
...early 1980s, Democrats repeatedly have used the Social Security issue to burn...key elections. Democrats substantially...supporting a freeze on Social Security benefits the previous...complain that Democrats are up to their...
Social Security option; DeMint bill puts Democrats on the spot.(OPED)
Newspaper article from: The Washington Times June 23, 2005 700+ words
...to resist. Democrats have said...money out of Social Security. Mr. DeMint...market risk. Democrats have said Social Security surpluses...say that the Democrats' arguments...accounts help Social Security's finances...
Democrats assail Bush's Social Security proposal.(Knight Ridder/Tribune News...
Newspaper article from: Knight Ridder/Tribune News Service O'Reilly, Kevin B. June 30, 2002 700+ words
...fall, Senate Democrats on Thursday attacked...President Bush's Social Security reform proposal...by 49 Senate Democrats and independent...of guaranteed Social Security benefits...the only Senate Democrat not signing the...
Democrats assail Bush's Social Security proposal.
Newspaper article from: Knight Ridder/Tribune (via Knight-Ridder/Tribune News Service) June 13, 2002 700+ words
...fall, Senate Democrats on Thursday attacked...President Bush's Social Security reform proposal...by 49 Senate Democrats and independent...of guaranteed Social Security benefits...the only Senate Democrat not signing the...
Social Security battler eignites; President Bush says it needs fixing, while...
Newspaper article from: The Washington Times July 9, 2006 700+ words
...Foundation, predicted Social Security reform probably...took away from Social Security is if you try...act broadly." Democrats anticipate that...Montana, top Democrat on the Finance...to get their Social Security plan approved...
Social Security reform mocked; Democrats deny crisis exists.(NATION)
Newspaper article from: The Washington Times January 17, 2005 700+ words
...problem." Democrats have pointed...projection that Social Security is "solvent...Oregon Democrat. "But once...future." "Social Security faces a challenge...Michigan Democrat, argued...Republican, said Democrats for years "used Social Security to beat ...
White House sees Democrats budging on reform; Asks for Social Security...
Newspaper article from: The Washington Times March 5, 2005 700+ words
...benefits and privatize Social Security; he is deliberately...wants to reform Social Security or privatize it...with other Senate Democrats. The White House...Harry Reid, Nevada Democrat, spoke at a forum on Social Security reform, hosted...
For more facts and information, see all results
©2009 Gale, a part of Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.
About us | FAQs | Contact us | Privacy policy | Terms and conditions
Other Gale sites: Encyclopedia.com | HighBeam Research | Acquire Content | Books & Authors | Goliath | MovieRetriever | Smart QandA