AccessMyLibrary provides FREE access to over 30 million articles from top publications available through your library.
Create a link to this page
Copy and paste this link tag into your Web page or blog:
NEW YORK, MARCH 6
HARRY TRUMAN is forever remembered for having said, "The buck stops here!" This came at a high moment in confusion and recriminations during the postwar federal scandals. It isn't by any means established that President Truman bungled his responsibilities as chief executive. What he said merely reflected his time in the Army, in which there is cognitive training on responsibility based on the chain of command.
This chain is unbending, and it is, for exactly that reason, implausible. It is one thing to draw an absolutely straight line from the lowest private to the Army commander. Anyone with a handbook describing promotions can do it. If today's exercise is to plot successive promotions until you reach four-star general, why go ahead. Junior can do it without thinking. In fact, not thinking will help.
Where complications enter in is with the commander in chief, who is not in the military line of promotion, but who has authority over the armed forces. Now, the complexity of command does not shield the commander in chief from formal responsibility. If the head of Walter Reed Hospital has done a lousy job, whom do you complain to, if not the secretary of the Army, who reports in turn to the president? But remember that this is a disciplinary question. The tougher question is: Whom and what do you blame?
Millions of Americans exercise responsibilities at various levels. At home, to begin with. On the job, of course. When businessmen and businesswomen are successful, their talents are sought by organizations ranging from the local branch of the Boy Scouts up to AT&T. When an organization appoints directors, the objective is to diffuse, not to concentrate, responsibility. The theory is that good management will result when responsibility is shared.
Of course the point arrives where it can't be shared, even as the moment comes for the soldier to shoot or not to shoot.
But the eagerness to blame President Bush for the mess at Walter Reed tells us that what we are engaged in is not a healthy exercise in management. It tells us that in search of an object of political contumely, we permit ...
Source: HighBeam Research, Chasing the buck.