AccessMyLibrary provides FREE access to over 30 million articles from top publications available through your library.
Create a link to this page
Copy and paste this link tag into your Web page or blog:
THE Bush White House often gets things right--eventually, and sometimes after exhausting all other alternatives. President Bush is calling for more troops in Baghdad, at least a year after it became clear that we needed them. He abandoned his stay-the-course rhetoric and fired Don Rumsfeld, too late to affect the elections. In the State of the Union address, Bush called for bipartisanship, criticized the abuse of earmarked spending, and outlined a creative plan to reform health care. Where was this Bush a year ago?
The president made a solid case for victory in Iraq, and for the necessity of an increase in troop strength in effecting it. He did not acknowledge what an editorialist should but a president probably cannot: that the surge might not work. The opposition's refusal to stand and applaud the mere call for victory was a more accurate guide to its position than its stated words. So was the silence of respondent Jim Webb, the Democratic senator from Virginia, on the subject of victory. The Democrats believe that we have lost the war and should get out, but think it impolitic to say so. Hawks have derided their lack of political courage, but can take heart from what it says about public opinion.
Bush's health plan is genuinely innovative. He recognizes that the tax favoritism for employer-provided health care has distorted the market, so he wants to restructure the tax break in a more rational way. Under his plan, individuals who buy their own insurance would get the same favorable tax treatment as those who get insurance through their workplace. The size of the tax break would be flat: If they bought a cheaper policy, they would be able to pocket the difference. Democrats have said that his plan is a non-starter on their Hill, but it will be an effective counter to their own proposals. It is an ...