AccessMyLibrary provides FREE access to over 30 million articles from top publications available through your library.
Create a link to this page
Copy and paste this link tag into your Web page or blog:
RISK AND EVERYDAY LIFE John Tulloch and Deborah Lupton Sage Publications, London: 2003, ISBN 0761947590; PB 152pp; USD 32.95 / AUD 29.95
Risk and Everyday Life is an extremely readable and interesting book about an interdisciplinary topic which seems to have as much currency as it provides avenues for illuminating research. Furthermore, it is no less rigorous for its readability.
This book uses the risk theory of Ulrich Beck in order to analyse the responses to 134 one-to-one interviews from 60 respondents in the United Kingdom and 74 in Australia (Tulloch and Lupton 2003:11-12; hereafter only page numbers will be given). The interviews were conducted between 1997 and 2000 with a range of people but representative of sex, age, education and occupation. The UK respondents resided in Oxford, Coventry and Cardiff; the Australians interviewed lived in Sydney and the Blue Mountains, Wollongong and Bathurst (p.12).
Deborah Lupton and John Tulloch were interested in a number of questions in their project, including the following (p.11):
What does 'risk' as a concept mean to people and how do they see it affecting their lives? What risks do people consider most threatening or important to themselves and to members of the society in which they live? Which individuals, social groups or institutions do they see as causing or having responsibility over risk? What evidence is there for 'reflexivity' and a move towards 'individualization' in people's understandings of and responses to risks? Is risk perceived as democratising in its universal effects, as Beck sees it, or do the old 'modernist' categories of age, gender, social class and so on still play an important role in the way people understand and deal with risk?
They also ask:
What are the narratives, epistemologies, discourses, rhetorical moves, choices of 'rational arguments' and courses of action which people use to organise 'risk' as a cultural concept?