AccessMyLibrary provides FREE access to over 30 million articles from top publications available through your library.
Create a link to this page
Copy and paste this link tag into your Web page or blog:
Having read George Gilder's article, I am no more convinced of Intelligent Design than I was before I started it; in fact, I'd say I'm more unconvinced. I expected at least some rational arguments for Intelligent Design, but there was almost no insight based on facts: Gilder hand-waves, produces no evidence, and does not make any verifiable predictions. He also says things that are flat wrong. Contrary to his assertions, evolutionary biology is able to explain cooperative behavior, and evolutionary biologists have offered replies to Michael Behe's ...