AccessMyLibrary provides FREE access to over 30 million articles from top publications available through your library.

Cross-cultural perspectives on the classification of children with disabilities: Part II. Implementing classification systems in schools.

The Journal of Special Education

| March 22, 2006 | McLaughlin, Margaret J.; Dyson, Alan; Nagle, Katherine; Thurlow, Martha; Rouse, Martyn; Hardman, Michael; Norwich, Brahm; Burke, Phillip J.; Perlin, Michael | COPYRIGHT 2006 Pro-Ed. This material is published under license from the publisher through the Gale Group, Farmington Hills, Michigan.  All inquiries regarding rights should be directed to the Gale Group. (Hide copyright information)Copyright

This article is the second in a 2-part synthesis of an international comparative seminar on the classification of children with disabilities. In this article, the authors discuss classification frameworks used in identifying children for the purpose of providing special education and related services. The authors summarize 7 papers that addressed aspects of disability classification in educational systems in the United States and the United Kingdom. They discuss current policies for determining which children receive special education services, the origins and evolution of these policies, and current dilemmas and challenges associated with classification schemes and the provision of special education. The authors also describe emerging data and possible models and practices that might be used in educational systems. They conclude with the recognition that both formal and informal educational classification systems will continue to be required within a system that must address the competing priorities of individual needs and the broader social and community goals of education. However, as was argued in the previous article, by understanding the mix of intentions that underpin these policies, as well as periodically reviewing the norms that underlie them, it may be possible to move classification to descriptors that can be used to efficiently and effectively define educational needs and distribute resources.

**********

In Part I of this two-part synthesis of a seminar on the classification of children with disabilities (see Florian et al., this issue), we discussed historical and emerging conceptual frameworks for classifying childhood disabilities and some of the issues associated with using such classifications for educational purposes. In this article, we discuss how those frameworks and associated assumptions have been interpreted within educational systems, specifically as they pertain to the identification of children with disabilities for purposes of providing specialized educational services. We synthesize seven papers that addressed aspects of disability classification in educational systems in the United States and the United Kingdom. We also discuss current policies for determining which children receive special education services, the origins and evolution of these policies, and current dilemmas and challenges associated with classification schemes and the provision of special education. We conclude with a description of models and practices and outline some future directions for the classification of students with disabilities in educational systems.

As noted in Florian et al. (this issue), the classification of children and youth with disabilities is both controversial and complex. When applied specifically for the purpose of determining eligibility for additional specialized educational services, classification can be fraught with many problems. Unlike classification that may take place in clinical settings, classification in school systems is a messy process influenced by many individuals and conducted in an environment of rationed resources. The dilemmas associated with classification have been abundantly dissected in the U.S. and U.K. special education research and policy literature (e.g., Ainscow, 1994, 1999; Booth, 1983; Donovan & Cross, 2002; Heller, Holtzman, & Messick, 1982; Tomlinson, 1982, 1995).

Despite the struggles, the fundamental intent of classifying students with disabilities in schools has primarily been to provide additional educational services and interventions to address individual children's needs. However, within a climate of limited resources and an educational system with inherent inflexibility in what it can provide, classifying students to determine eligibility for special education may take on other purposes that better serve the constraints of the larger system than the targeted children's needs. Classification policies have been roundly criticized in both countries. There are longstanding concerns that labeling or classification is a social construction that reduces individual children to a label to which are attached negative stereotypes, expectations, and exclusion (Tomlinson, 1982). Additional criticisms include the instructional irrelevance of disability labels (Donovan & Cross, 2002; Ysseldyke, 2001) and variability in the implementation of classification criteria (Mercer, Jordan, Allsopp, & Mercer, 1996). The cross-cultural comparison of the evolution of current special education eligibility policies is the focus of this article.

Background of U.S. and U.K. Policies

There are striking similarities between, as well as differences in, the special education classification policies employed by U.S. and U.K. educators and policymakers. Some of these differences are attributable to deep cultural traditions regarding the purpose of schooling and to interpretations of individual civil rights. Before we examine the country-specific aspects of special education policies and the classification of students with disabilities, it is important to note some basic differences between the educational systems in the United States and the United Kingdom.

Related articles from newspapers, magazines, journals, and more
Kurzweil Educational Systems Announces Kurzweil 3000 for Macintosh Version 2;...
Press release article from: Business Wire October 15, 2003 700+ words
...15, 2003 Kurzweil Educational Systems, Inc., innovator...and CEO, Kurzweil Educational Systems. "While other reading...Relations. "Kurzweil Educational Systems shares the commitment to the special education market with Apple...
Survey of the states: special education knowledge requirements for school...
Magazine article from: Exceptional Children Valesky, Thomas C. Hirth, Marilyn A. March 1, 1992 700+ words
...knowledge of special education law is not sufficient...of regular and special education into a single and...Although two separate educational systems have evolved over...unify regular and special education has gained prominence...
Cambium Learning to Acquire Kurzweil Educational Systems; Leading Education...
Press release article from: PR Newswire April 7, 2005 700+ words
...acquire Kurzweil Educational Systems(R), Inc...addition of Kurzweil Educational Systems to its family...minority and special education student population...technologies, Kurzweil Educational Systems is widely recognized...
Kurzweil Educational Systems Collaborates with Educational Leaders to Expand...
Press release article from: Business Wire May 12, 2003 700+ words
...disabilities Kurzweil Educational Systems, Inc., innovator...Department of Special Education at Peabody College...disabilities. "Kurzweil Educational Systems has a long history...President of Kurzweil Educational Systems. The new collaboration...
Kurzweil Educational Systems, Inc. Joins the National Center for Learning...
Press release article from: Business Wire March 15, 2004 700+ words
...Award Kurzweil Educational Systems, Inc., innovator...from Kurzweil Educational Systems. Each year with...training to both special education and core content...from Kurzweil Educational Systems will enable Muskegon...
Kurzweil Educational Systems Honors Student, Teacher and School.
Press release article from: Business Wire October 15, 2004 700+ words
...Education Kurzweil Educational Systems, Inc., innovator...annual Kurzweil Educational Systems Kurzweil 3000...her school's special education staff and sheer...in general or special education, who demonstrates...
Kurzweil Educational Systems Honored for Excellence, Wins Industry Awards.
Press release article from: Business Wire December 8, 2003 700+ words
...Disabilities Kurzweil Educational Systems, Inc., innovator...winner under the Special Education Products category...About Kurzweil Educational Systems, Inc. Kurzweil Educational Systems, founded in 1996...
Fairfax County Public Schools Awards Implementation of New Student Information...
Press release article from: Business Wire January 30, 2009 700+ words
...contract with Edupoint Educational Systems for the implementation...using Edupoint's Special Education product, GENESEA...trademarks of Edupoint Educational Systems. About Edupoint...counterpart in Special Education, GENESEA[TM...
L&H to Acquire Kurzweil Educational Systems and Enters Educational Market With...
Press release article from: Business Wire September 1, 1998 700+ words
...agreement to acquire Kurzweil Educational Systems (KESI), a leading developer...approximately 1,500 schools and educational systems. Future products are expected...both for the general and special education sectors, are being given...
Aspen Education Group Opens First Boarding School in California; 'The Academy...
Press release article from: PR Newswire December 4, 2003 700+ words
...ages 14-18 who struggle with the demands of traditional educational systems. With its opening, the Academy becomes the only boarding...therapeutic environments, such as boarding schools, special education day schools, outdoor therapy and wilderness intervention...
For more facts and information, see all results

Source: HighBeam Research, Cross-cultural perspectives on the classification of children with...

©2009 Gale, a part of Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.
About us | FAQs | Contact us | Privacy policy | Terms and conditions
Other Gale sites: Encyclopedia.com | HighBeam Research | Acquire Content | Books & Authors | Goliath | MovieRetriever | Smart QandA