AccessMyLibrary provides FREE access to over 30 million articles from top publications available through your library.
Create a link to this page
Copy and paste this link tag into your Web page or blog:
If you're a director of a publicly traded company who are you responsible to - (1) the executives who put you there in the first place or (2) the shareholders? If you answered #1 you can stop reading this column right here.
When Fannie Mae chairman and CEO Franklin Raines (one of the most "connected" men in Washington) and company chief financial officer Timothy Howard got the boot in December 2004, the GSE's board of directors practically had tears in their eyes.
The only reason the company got rid of Messrs. Raines and Howard was because the Office of Federal Housing Enterprise Oversight was ready to get rid of the board. (One of these days, hopefully, the real story of the board's comeuppance will be told.)
Shortly before - and then after - the two men got forced out (by the board), a handful of mortgage executives close to the GSE had told us on several occasions that the board had no plans to ax two men, despite mounting evidence that they played a key role in bending accounting rules that resulted in what will be an $11 billion downward statement of earnings.
(One of these days this downward restatement will actually happen.)
Now the big question: Why was the board not critical of Messrs. Raines and Howard? Why did it take a regulator holding a baseball bat to their heads to get them to act?
Granted, until the Freddie Mac accounting scandal broke in June of 2003, few politicians had the guts to go after the GSEs, Rep. Richard Baker, R-La., being one of the few. On the surface it appeared to a battle of competitors - the GSEs vs. their critics (and competition) at FM Watch, a group whose mission started as a way to combat GSE "charter creep."
Source: HighBeam Research, Will Fannie Mae's Board Ever Come Clean?(Federal National Mortgage...