Bush is your soft drink: republicans 'distance' themselves at their peril.

GEORGE W. BUSH'S sagging approval ratings have been accompanied, not coincidentally, by an increasing amount of criticism from his allies in Congress. But while some Republicans have decided that it's time to declare independence from the White House, other party strategists have a warning: If Bush sinks too deep into lame-duck territory now, we will see a large flock of GOP dead ducks in the upcoming election season.

Bush's poll numbers are undeniably poor. In a mid-March Pew Research Center survey, only 33 percent of respondents approved of the president's job performance, down from 50 percent a year ago. Bush's ratings on the handling of specific issues have also declined significantly, with only 42 percent now approving of the way Bush is handling the threat of terrorism. That's down 11 percent from mid-February. The poll also reports that negative descriptions of the president now outnumber positive ones, with "incompetent" topping the list at 29 percent, and "honest" slipping to 14 percent. Even more alarmingly, much of the erosion of Bush's support has come from his political base. In the last year, his approval among conservative Republicans has dropped by 16 points. Among people who voted for him in 2004, it has fallen by 24 points.

Many congressional Republicans are among the disenchanted. "Arrogant" and "insular" lead the list of adjectives that Republicans in Congress volunteer when asked to describe what ails the White House. They recount the sluggish response to Hurricane Katrina, the doomed nomination of Harriet Miers, the backbiting following the Cheney shooting incident, and the defiant, tone-deaf response to congressional objections over the Dubai ports deal.

A common criticism holds that the Bush administration has become more insular over time as departing officials have been replaced by less experienced junior staffers. One congressional critic echoes a common criticism of the White House's hiring policy. "Unless you get in on the ground floor, you can't get on the elevator. You can't penetrate the White House unless you have been there from the very beginning." An administration ally adds, "There are only so many times you can promote the deputy's deputy without paying a price in competency."

Like a troubled marriage, the latest spat between the White House and congressional Republicans reflects longstanding, unresolved problems. ASenate leadership aide says that when the president himself deals with Republican senators, they often "come out of the meeting ready to eat out of his hand." But this personal charm is quickly dispelled by other administration officials, who regularly come off as patronizing and highhanded. The Senate aide summarizes the message that these officials convey: "You can come to the White House mess and kiss the ring and tell us what you can do for us." This alienates Republican staffers on Capitol Hill, who decry the imperious attitude that they get from the White House: "This is what the president wants. You need to get with the program."

One veteran House aide puts it succinctly: "The Republicans are so over this White House."

In the Daily News, Tom DeFrank argues that this attitude is good politics. "Distancing themselves from a polarizing President whose job-approval rating hits 40% on a good day is shrewd electoral positioning," he writes. David Keene, chairman of the American Conservative Union, similarly advises Republicans in The Hill newspaper that they need to "get their act together." What does he have in mind? "The president's approval rating seems to have tanked," he writes, "but why would Republican voters take their frustration with him out on their congressman or senator when most of them are doing just about all they can do to put just a little distance between themselves and the White House?" As Tim Russert reports, "Congressional Republicans are panicked and petrified.... They are going to separate ...