AccessMyLibrary provides FREE access to over 30 million articles from top publications available through your library.
Create a link to this page
Copy and paste this link tag into your Web page or blog:
George Plimpton's Truman Capote (1997), a self-proclaimed "oral biography," revisits Capote's In Cold Blood and the author's often flamboyant interaction with the individuals from whom he gleaned the details necessary for his famous "nonfiction novel." One of the more vivid anecdotes in Plimpton's book comes from Harold Nye, a Kansas Bureau of Investigation officer whom Capote interviewed, who recounts a night on the town with the author:
My wife is a very strict individual, straight as an arrow. One time in Kansas City, Truman asked us if we wanted to go out for the evening. Sure, you don't turn him down. First, we get a cab, and just off the main street ... he pays a hundred bucks to get us into a place above a gallery to watch what's going on in a lesbian bar. Now, here is what it was: they were eating, tables, dancing, probably a hundred people in there, female couples doing their thing. This was horrible to my wife. She tried to turn away from it, but she didn't say anything to Truman. We leave and he takes us over to a male gay bar. We sit down and order a drink, and it isn't three minutes until some of these young bucks nail him, talking to him, playing with his ears, just right in front of my wife. But how the hell do you say anything to a man as famous as Truman Capote that you don't like what he's doing. We finally
tried to excuse ourselves and leave. But Truman gets us to go on to the Jewel Box, a little theatre, and, you know, I expect there must have been thirty female impersonators in there ... and they're damn good. I mean, they looked as good as any beautiful babes in New York. But at the end of these little skits they revealed that
they were males. Now, to take this lady-and Truman knew what kind
of lady she was, because he had been to my house-and subject her to this ... Well, his stock went down from sixty per cent down to about ten. (170-71) (1)
Most striking in this passage is the way in which Nye's account reveals the degree to which Capote values watching others witness a series of spectacles that he has specifically orchestrated for their shock. The jaw-dropping of the Kansans (who, despite averted eyes, gather a large amount of detail from the experience) provides a certain pleasure for Capote, and I contend that his choreography of this incident reflects a similar strategy in In Cold Blood. In the novel, Capote stages his story as he staged an evening for his Kansas guests, containing his characters within specific boundaries not only determined by the "history" of the actual Holcomb murders but by Capote's own desires for drama and scandal. Once contained in a novelistic structure reminiscent of Foucault's reiteration of Bentham's panopticon, Capote's characters are forced into a spectacle that offers readers of the book vicarious participation in the slaughter of an entire family from Kansas. In Capote's view, this strategy offers not only an angle into the criminal mind but a catharsis for an audience that can vent its own destructive energies through interaction with his novel rather than through violent action in the community. Understanding Capote's narrative strategy also identifies what may well be Capote's real contribution to the "nonfiction novel": the panopticon as template for fictionalizing nonfiction events in a novel.
Panopticism in Capote's In Cold Blood