AccessMyLibrary provides FREE access to over 30 million articles from top publications available through your library.
Create a link to this page
Copy and paste this link tag into your Web page or blog:
Byline: BRIAN DEAGON
The U.S. Supreme Court set a new legal precedent in "product tying" cases with a ruling on Wednesday that gives firms more leeway to bundle products for sale to customers.
In an 8-0 decision, the court sided with Illinois Tool Works, which claimed that patents do not automatically infer that the holder has a so-called "market power" that forces people to buy things they don't want. Justice Samuel Alito didn't participate in the ruling.
The case of Illinois Tool Works vs. Independent Ink focused on ITW's sales of an industrial printer that requires that purchasers also buy its ink. The ruling went against Independent Ink, which claimed ITW was "tying" the sale of its ink with that of its patented printer, thus violating antitrust laws.
ITW agreed with privately held Independent Ink that it was engaged in product tying practices. ITW instead argued that the courts should overturn a 60-year stand that such activity was illegal.
The Supreme Court's decision reverses the burden of proof in product tying cases. No longer is a patent or copyright given the blanket assumption of having market power.
Burden Of Proof