AccessMyLibrary provides FREE access to over 30 million articles from top publications available through your library.
Create a link to this page
Copy and paste this link tag into your Web page or blog:
The Julia Richmond Award is given, Harvard says, to those who "have promoted and achieved high standards for public health conditions."
In this case, as a letter to an outraged alumnus, American Council of Science and Health President Elizabeth Whelan said, it's for Brockovich's efforts "on behalf of all of us, and especially the residents of Hinkley, California, whose health was adversely affected by a toxic substance dumped by a utility company."
Her alleged fight for environmental justice was told in the cleverly titled 2000 movie "Erin Brockovich."
In it, the Brockovich character, played by Julia Roberts, and showing more cleavage than scientific knowledge, is a crusading legal assistant who exposes the alleged poisoning of everything -- from chickens to frogs to people -- by a Pacific Gas & Electric (PG&E) plant's leaching of a rust inhibitor called chromium-6 into the water supply of nearby Hinkley.
Only problem: It was all false.
No one chemical agent could possibly have caused all the symptoms described in the film, and chromium-6 in the water couldn't have caused any of them.
The fact is that the EPA does list chromium-6 as a carcinogen, but only for 2 types of cancer, that of the nose and of the septum (the cartilage between your nostrils). It only causes cancer when inhaled. And even then, it takes massive doses over many years.