AccessMyLibrary provides FREE access to over 30 million articles from top publications available through your library.
Create a link to this page
Copy and paste this link tag into your Web page or blog:
Media: When a conservative television evangelist calls for the assassination of a foreign leader, the feeding frenzy is enormous. When an adviser to a Democratic president does the same, he gets a cushy network anchor job.
Funny, but we don't recall the same outrage eight years ago that greeted Pat Robertson's recent call to "take out" Venezuelan thug Hugo Chavez. Back in 1997, George Stephanopoulos, fresh from his influential post in the Clinton White House, called for the assassination of Saddam Hussein in a Newsweek article subtly titled "Why We Should Kill Saddam."
No self-righteous editorials condemning Stephanopoulos as a loose cannon. No endless talking-head discussions on how his words upset our diplomatic efforts in the Middle East. No reprimands on how a dictator was given proof that the U.S. was out to get him.
Instead, Stephanopoulos has been rewarded with media prominence and gets to expound his moderate views on ABC's "This Week."
Unlike private citizen Robertson, Stephanopoulos advanced his idea when he still had the ear of the U.S. president, after we had just fought a war with Iraq. "Assassination may be Clinton's best option," Stephanopoulos wrote. "If we can kill Saddam, we should."
In 1997, U.N. sanctions were in place, and it would be another year before Saddam kicked out U.N. weapons inspectors. Many said then, as now, that Saddam Hussein was "contained" and that there was no need for further hostile action on our part. Yet here was a presidential confidant and adviser arguing that Saddam ...