AccessMyLibrary provides FREE access to over 30 million articles from top publications available through your library.

Navasky's lullaby.(A Matter of Opinion)(Book Review)

National Review

| June 06, 2005 | Freeman, Neal B. | COPYRIGHT 2005 National Review, Inc. This material is published under license from the publisher through the Gale Group, Farmington Hills, Michigan.  All inquiries regarding rights should be directed to the Gale Group. (Hide copyright information)Copyright

A Matter of Opinion, by Victor S. Navasky (Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 464 pp., $27)

IN this absorbing account of his long stewardship of The Nation, Victor Navasky provides unimpeachable testimony that in matters of national consequence he and his magazine have been--what's the word we're looking for here?--wrong. Yes, that's it: Wrong on the Stalinists. Wrong on terrorism. Wrong on the nuclear freeze. Wrong on socialism. Wrong on welfare reform. Wrong on educational choice. Wrong on tax incentives. Wrong on the culture of life. And of course wrong on people, from Reagan to Vidal to Castro to Thatcher to Hiss. (Navasky carried the torch for Alger Hiss even after the last flame had flickered dead from oxygen deprivation. One can almost hear Hiss crying from some dark smoke-hole, "I love you, Vic, but let it go, man, let it go.") For his misperceptions and misprescriptions we didn't really need a book-length recitation. A handwritten note of apology, terse and abject, might have struck the right tone.

But this book, lodged as it is in the dictatorship of relativism, isn't really about right and wrong. It's the story of a guy who falls head over heels for a little magazine, a real bodice-ripper, and for that we forgive him almost everything. Don't look here for media trivia about power, fame, and money. If Navasky had fallen for a big magazine, or a cable channel, there would have been no romance here, no boy-meets-magazine lullaby. No, with the career recounted in this book Navasky takes his place in that distinguished line of peace-disturbing editors who kept the democratic conversation going: men like Addison and Steele, with The Spectator and The Tatler. Walter Bagehot was a little-magazine guy, at The Economist, as were Albert Jay Nock at The Freeman and Carey McWilliams at The Nation. In our own day, we have an editor named Buckley at NATIONAL REVIEW and Martin Peretz at The New Republic. Victor Navasky, arriving later but asserting his claim every bit as forcefully, is in their company.

As distinctive, even singular, as their voices have been, these little-magazine guys have much in common. Most conspicuous is their Archimedean conceit. While most human beings trudge to the office to perform a job and pick up a paycheck, the little-magazine guy dashes down to the office to move the world. The world is not so much his oyster as a hod to be carried, an object to be levered from where it is and obviously shouldn't be to somewhere else where, properly positioned, it will produce a better world. This is heady work, bordering on the delusional, which may explain why little-magazine staff dynamics sometimes resemble those of Jack Nicholson's ward-mates in One Flew Over the Cuckoo's Nest. It's a tough job, this world-moving business. Results differ, we can see, depending on the angle of leverage and the rhetorical force applied. One sees clearly for instance that, in Buckley's case, with a nudge here and a shove there, he managed to turn the world upside down. Navasky, for his part, could only watch in pain as the world rolled back over his exposed toes. But who's counting wins and losses here, it's how you play the game. Or to sound less like a loser: It's important that the game be played, that the debate be intelligent and protracted, that every idea get its chance and that none gain uncritical acceptance.

Little magazines are thus concerned always and everywhere with the principle of the thing. As payday approaches, how ever, the principle may be put to one side as the boss concentrates on the money of the thing. Or lack of it. For it is the dirty little secret of journals right, left, and center that their persistence rebukes capitalism's assumption about economic decisions' being driven by profit motive. To my knowledge, and more conclusively, to Navasky's, nobody has ever invested in a little magazine with the expectation of financial profit. Psychic rewards abound, of course. Nothing sets you up in the morning like a good earth-moving edition of your little ...

Related articles from newspapers, magazines, journals, and more
Barnes & Noble blunder.(The Nation's publisher/editorial director Victor...
Magazine article from: The Nation Cockburn, Alexander July 15, 1996 700+ words
...of the world's media empires, Victor Navasky, "editorial director" of The Nation...been decrying only a few weeks before. Navasky lives on the Upper West Side of Manhattan...didn't get books quickly enough for Navasky, and weren't adequately "solicitous...
Opinion's place in journalism: Victor S. Navasky explains why he loathes...
Magazine article from: Nieman Reports Jenkins, Ray September 22, 2005 700+ words
A Matter of Opinion Victor S. Navasky Farrar, Straus and Giroux 464 Pages...the reader will sense that Victor S. Navasky is taking us on a rollicking joy ride...As he gathers speed, we discover that Navasky is also ruminating--confronting and...
Notes on Navasky.(LETTERS)(Letter to the Editor)
Magazine article from: Columbia Journalism Review Stern, Willy Dodell, Nathan September 1, 2005 700+ words
The recent Victor Navasky kerfuffle, and your institutional unwillingness...the way, is simply delicious--the Navasky episode means I will no longer read nor...Columbia's J-school, appointed Victor Navasky to oversee C JR, replacing David Laventhol...
Victor Navasky and the state of The Nation.
Magazine article from: Folio: the Magazine for Magazine Management Garigliano, Jeff September 1, 1998 700+ words
Victor Navasky clearly enjoys a challenge. In 1994...editor of the liberal weekly The Nation, Navasky arranged to buy the magazine "with money...lend financial support to keep it alive. Navasky, now publisher and editorial director...
CAREY MCWILLIAMS AWARD.(co-winners Victor Navasky, William Kristol)(Brief...
Magazine article from: The Nation September 17, 2001 700+ words
* Victor Navasky is co-winner of the American Political Science Association's Carey...a willingness to alienate their own constituencies. We congratulate Navasky and commend to Kristol the writings of Carey McWilliams.
Awards time. (In Fact ...).(The Nation's Victor Navasky and Katrina vanden...
Magazine article from: The Nation June 9, 2003 700+ words
* Victor Navasky, Nation publisher and editorial director, and Nation editor Katrina vanden Heuvel were awarded the Joseph Callaway Prize for...
Navasky replies.(Letters)(Letter to the Editor)
Magazine article from: The Nation Navasky, Victor S. November 10, 2003 700+ words
New York City * First, Charles Lane takes me to task for quoting a paragraph from what he calls "private" correspondence with EI's director. Since Lane sent it in response to the director's letter to the Post, I assumed it was not meant to be unpublic. Second, Lane takes me to task for not quoting
The pertinacious Hissolators.(Commentary)
Newspaper article from: The Washington Times Beichman, Arnold December 29, 1996 700+ words
...Hiss' guilt, Mr. Navasky posed this question...Espionage, is it really so wrong?" I should hasten to say in Mr. Navasky's defense that he...Espionage, is it really so wrong?" In other words, according to Mr. Navasky, even if for the sake...
For more facts and information, see all results

Source: HighBeam Research, Navasky's lullaby.(A Matter of Opinion)(Book Review)

©2009 Gale, a part of Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.
About us | FAQs | Contact us | Privacy policy | Terms and conditions
Other Gale sites: Encyclopedia.com | HighBeam Research | Acquire Content | Books & Authors | Goliath | MovieRetriever | Smart QandA