AccessMyLibrary provides FREE access to over 30 million articles from top publications available through your library.
Create a link to this page
Copy and paste this link tag into your Web page or blog:
It may be a while before we know what reform of the government-sponsored enterprises means for mortgage servicers. But some of the broad outlines of what is likely to occur - if GSE reform is enacted - have taken shape. You can expect to see a regulator with stronger powers, for instance. The GSEs may find it more difficult to obtain authority to engage in new activities, especially if those activities infringe upon the origination of loans.
And, last but not least, the GSEs may find themselves operating under limits to how large they can grow their portfolios. In recent years, both Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac have made hefty profits by holding home loans in portfolio and issuing debt in the capital markets to finance those portfolios. In essence, they have been acting as giant thrifts.
While that portfolio business has helped make the GSEs more profitable than ever before (Fannie Mae's earnings doubled during the tenure of ousted CEO Franklin Raines), growth in the portfolios has heightened concern about the safety and soundness of the housing GSEs. That's because the long-term mortgage portfolios that serve as assets on the GSEs' books are largely financed using short-term debt, precisely the scenario that got the thrift industry in trouble starting back in the early 1980s.
The ...
Source: HighBeam Research, Secondary Changes.(GSE reform )