AccessMyLibrary provides FREE access to over 30 million articles from top publications available through your library.
Create a link to this page
Copy and paste this link tag into your Web page or blog:
Nowadays, everything is a brand. Have you noticed? Not just Marmite or Rice Krispies or Finish dishwasher powder, but everything from the NHS to Britain to Beckham to the Labour Party.
Is this helpful? Does it add value to a term at the very heart of what we in this business are trying to create? We know what is meant by, for example, calling a political party a 'brand': most things in this world are more than the sum of their parts and this is a passable definition of what a brand is. What's more, you can be sure that all the major parties talked and thought about themselves as brands in the run-up to this election.
But the truth is they aren't brands, can't be brands. They don't and won't obey some of the obvious rules of branding. For one thing, political events are not remotely susceptible to advertising. Over many years, the parties have used advertising (some of it very good) without it having any discernible effect on the outcome of an election.
True, political parties choose to adopt some of the trappings of branding - logos, corporate looks, music, straplines etc - but there is precious little evidence any of this actually works. Remember the famous Kinnock makeover in the 80s? Cue the next Thatcher landslide.
By the time you read this, we'll know - or be close to knowing - the outcome of this ...