AccessMyLibrary provides FREE access to over 30 million articles from top publications available through your library.
Create a link to this page
Copy and paste this link tag into your Web page or blog:
Geopolitics: Critics who claimed the war in Iraq was motivated by American lust for Mideast crude are strangely silent as China protects a murderous Sudanese regime to meet its own growing energy needs.
Darfur is actually Sudanese President Omar Hassan al Bashir's second genocidal campaign against the people he rules. The first was waged against the Christian and animist peoples of south and central Sudan.
From the early 1990s to 2002, more than 2 million people were estimated to have perished and 5 million were displaced in an area centered on what is known as Block 5 before peace protocols were finally signed in 2004. Block 5 is an area designated for oil exploration.
The world did not pay as much attention then as it does now when the victims are the black, Sufi Muslims of Darfur in western Sudan. But lost in the carnage is perhaps the main reason for the atrocities and the main reason the United Nations has been ineffective in moving to stop the killing -- China's veto and its interest in Sudanese oil.
"It's very clear what's happening," said Georgette Gagnon, deputy director of the Africa desk at Human Rights. "China is the largest foreign investor in Sudan, so it has an economic interest in ensuring that the Sudanese government is not penalized too harshly. It has been opposed to sanctions from Day One."
When the U.N. Security Council passed Resolution 1564, threatening Sudan with oil sanctions unless it curbed the violence in Darfur, China threatened to veto any effort to impose an embargo on Sudan, which supplies 7% of China's oil imports.
China's oil needs are expected to grow 10% a year for the foreseeable future, and it has invested $15 billion in developing Sudanese oil fields through its China National Petroleum ...