The good and the bad (plus some ugly): moments on campus.(instances of excessive liberalism, political correctness, on college campuses)

TODAY'S college campus is a study in contrasts. Professors and administrators cling to their grotesque orthodoxies, but students seem to be getting saner by the year. What follows are five of the most outrageous campus incidents of the last academic year, then five of the most heartening acts of courage.

* The conservative-speaker double standard is almost an academic institution. At Bucknell University, administrators refused a student group's request to invite Republican congressman and Senate hopeful Pat Toomey to give a speech, arguing that his appearance would violate a school policy against electioneering on campus. Meanwhile, Bucknell paid presidential candidate Ralph Nader $13,000 to give the school's commencement address.

* In an environment that rewards and even reveres victimhood, some people will do anything to prove themselves worthy. In 2001, for example, a Muslim student at Arizona State falsely claimed--twice--that he'd been assaulted after September 11. Two years later, a black student at San Francisco State scratched "NIGG" on a dorm-room door and wrote the same on a note to herself. Last spring, Claremont McKenna professor Kerri Dunn reported that her car had been vandalized--tires slashed, windows broken, racist and anti-Semitic slogans spray-painted on--after she'd given a lecture on racism. The campus predictably responded with outrage; classes were cancelled and pro-diversity events held. But Dunn's credibility soon began to erode, and witnesses testified they'd seen her vandalizing the car herself. You know you're living in interesting times when those who make fighting intolerance their life's work feel the need to create it.

* Each year, the Collegiate Network selects five campus outrages for a special award. This year, one "winner" was the University of California-Santa Barbara, where the multicultural center, as part of its "Race Matters Series," sponsored a presentation by a Chicano Studies major called "F*$%ing with Stereotypes: Gay Men of Color in Porn." The student showed clips from porn films and led a discussion about how stereotypes of minorities in gay pornography negatively affect the men who watch it. The student's work--part of his senior thesis--received praise from administrators. One dean said the student "had done a lot of good work in this area, I appreciated his scholarship ..."; another administrator called the project an "intellectual exploration" and said, "I was pleased. It showed that we'd be willing to explore difficult dialogues at this university."

* Here's another example of what can happen when the bounds of tolerance are stretched too far--in this case, in the desperate search for Muslim reformers. Notre Dame appointed Islamic scholar Tariq Ramadan to a tenured professorship in "religion, conflict, and peacebuilding." Ramadan has always projected moderation to the West (as scholars of Islam go). But in July, just before he was to head for the U.S., the Department of Homeland Security revoked his work visa for security reasons. The department hasn't revealed the basis for its decision, but some--in particular Daniel Pipes--have pointed to Ramadan's alleged ties to Islamist terrorists. Nevertheless, Ramadan may still make it to Notre Dame: The university is looking into alternatives, and our very own State Department has suggested he apply for another kind of visa.

* Why aren't there more conservatives in academia? According to Robert Brandon, chairman of the philosophy department at Duke, it's because all the smart people are liberals. "We try to hire the best, smartest people available. If, as John Stuart Mill said, stupid people are generally conservative, then there are lots of conservatives we will never hire.... Players in the NBA tend to be taller than average. There is a good reason for this. Members of academia tend to be a bit smarter than average. There is a good reason for this too." Has Brandon's contempt for conservatives hampered his logical-reasoning ability? Even if most stupid people are Republicans, this tells us nothing about the percentage of Republicans among smart people. Mill was careful to make the distinction: "I never meant to say that the Conservatives are generally stupid. I meant to say that stupid people are generally Conservative." So why aren't there more Republicans in academia? Maybe it's because even the capable ones have been ...