AccessMyLibrary provides FREE access to over 30 million articles from top publications available through your library.
Create a link to this page
Copy and paste this link tag into your Web page or blog:
* Dear Mr. Buckley: Mr. Sparling's letter in Notes & Asides (May 17) stirred my thoughts regarding Peter Robinson's reference to "the mounting wave of dependent clauses that ends the second sentence" (in the example from your Fall of the Berlin Wall).
If I remember correctly the fine series of public-school language-arts teachers to whom I was assigned, "in the square-set resolution of their heads, the grimness of their expressions, and their disembodied attention to duty" is a single prepositional phrase with three objects of the preposition. What shall we call them? Perhaps three object phrases. (I clearly remember a classmate's being required to recite 25 times: "Every little preposition takes an object.")
My dictionary and my grammar book state that a clause has a subject and a predicate. But perhaps that definition has gone the way of so much else upon which we used to depend.
Kindest regards,
Richard Nazarenus
Newberry Springs, Calif.
* Dear Mr. Buckley: Though I run a lumberyard in the deep South and thus am no grammarian, I nearly shot scalding coffee out of my nose this morning when I read in "The Week" (May 3) that: "There but for the grace of God, went us."
Source: HighBeam Research, Notes & asides.(Letter to the Editor)