AccessMyLibrary provides FREE access to over 30 million articles from top publications available through your library.
Create a link to this page
Copy and paste this link tag into your Web page or blog:
IT was impossible for anyone, whatever his political persuasion, not to be a bit melancholy on the fiftieth anniversary of Brown v. Board of Education. The end of formal racial segregation in American education was a great advance, and Brown stood for that noble cause. But we are all aware that the promise of a better education for black children has not been fulfilled. Even worse, the civil-rights movement of 50 years ago has become a civil-rights establishment that is willing to stand in the schoolhouse door--this time, to block the exits.
It is Brown's potential for abuse that has been met: its tendency to aggrandize the judiciary. In the legal academy, it is widely assumed that the result of Brown is incompatible with the original meaning of the Fourteenth Amendment, and that this incompatibility is a decisive reason not to interpret the Constitution in line with its original meaning. More generally, judicial power has been infused with the romance of the landmark case.
Conservative scholars Robert Bork and Michael McConnell have tried to show that Brown reached the right ...
Source: HighBeam Research, Unhappy anniversary.(Brown V. Board)