AccessMyLibrary provides FREE access to over 30 million articles from top publications available through your library.
Create a link to this page
Copy and paste this link tag into your Web page or blog:
"Today, the people of Iraq have spoken to the world, and the world is hearing the voice of freedom from the center of the Middle East," asserted President Bush in a January 30 speech. Pundits from across the partisan divide were eager to describe the first Iraqi elections held under U.S. military occupation as a significant milestone in the "global march of freedom."
The president, predictably, was eager to seize upon the election as a validation of his decision to invade Iraq. However, as Time magazine correctly noted, the "real author" of the election was Iranian-born Grand Ayatollah Ali al-Sistani, who had issued a fatwa (religious order) commanding Iraq's Shi'ite Muslims to flock to the polls on behalf of Shi'ite-approved candidates. "The U.S. had never intended for Iraqis to democratically choose the body that would write their new constitution," continued Time. "Washington had envisaged an election only after a constitution had been written by a body appointed by, and under the tutelage of the U.S."
The original plan had been to hand Iraq over to a government composed of Iraqi exiles hand-picked by Washington and led by fugitive Ahmed Chalabi (who, as it turns out, may have been an Iranian agent). Plan "B" was ...
Source: HighBeam Research, Who "won" in Iraq's elections?(Insider Report)