AccessMyLibrary provides FREE access to over 30 million articles from top publications available through your library.

Did women really read differently? A historical-empirical contribution to gender-oriented reading research.

Women in German Yearbook

| January 01, 2004 | Schlichtmann, Silke | COPYRIGHT 2004 University of Nebraska Press. This material is published under license from the publisher through the Gale Group, Farmington Hills, Michigan.  All inquiries regarding rights should be directed to the Gale Group. (Hide copyright information)Copyright

Do women read differently? My article pursues this question from a historical perspective for the period around 1800. On the one hand, in a reflection that is methodical and source-based, it attempts to explain which requirements should be fulfilled by a reading research approach that is historically and empirically gender-oriented. On the other, it offers an exemplary implementation of the suggested research approach. In the process, what becomes clear is that an investigation that takes into account primarily the self-utterances of readers and proceeds in gender-comparative fashion will emerge with different results than previous work that was based on the reading craze around 1800 and ignored a firmly established gender-comparative approach. Instead of striking gender polarities, a picture emerges in which other factors, for example poetological concepts, appear as more influential than the category of gender. (SS)

**********

"Women read differently." This thesis, which Ruth Kluger first published in 1994 in the feature pages of Die Zeit (1994a) and has subsequently advocated in at least four other publications (Kluger 1994b, 1996a, 1996b, 2000), assumes, without offering proof, the effect not only of social, but also of biological gender; in other words, it clearly contains a strand of essentialistic reasoning that uses ahistorical arguments. Astonishingly, in spite of concurrent debates about the category of gender in gender-oriented reading research, Kluger's view has in the meantime become almost a commonplace--perhaps not least because it is so seductively catchy and also because of its inherent "feministically correct ethos" (Dieckmann). Do/did women actually read differently, as she asserts, and if so, to what extent? So far, at least from a historical perspective, this question has hardly been examined; similarly, the methodological presuppositions for postulating gender-differentiating theses in this context have rarely been explicitly discussed.

It is precisely this dual epistemological interest that I intend to pursue: have women read differently, and how can one find out? I plan to focus on the turn of the eighteenth century--that historical phase, in other words, during which, it is widely assumed, a first consolidation of the so-called two-gender model took place. The model posits a socio-cultural distinction between a masculine and a feminine gender character based on contradictory opposites (see, for example, Hausen; Honegger; Laqueur). In shaping this model of polarity, literature played an important role. First, the development of gender characters, particularly of the female gender character, was, implicitly, and often explicitly as well, a central literary theme. Second, reading itself is supposed to have been both the means of practicing, and the expression of enforcing, distinct gender characters. Accordingly, women read emotionally, with identification, and focusing on content, while male reading was rational and distanced, and prioritized the formal, aesthetic dimension--that, at any rate, is the tenor of the research.

State and Critique of the Research

This consensus is surprising in that studies of the history of readers for the above period that take into account ways of reading from the perspective of gender have been rare up to now. It is true that there has been analysis based on empirical material (books from lending libraries, letters, diaries, preparatory instruction in reading, etc.), dealing with gender-specific reading preferences and recommendations, that is, preferred or requested reading material (for instance, Martens; Raabe; Becher). (1) But with this focus on what was being read, the question of how reading was taking place, from a perspective that compared the genders--which is certainly harder to answer--has been, to a large extent, not considered.

Erich Schon and Friedrich A. Kittler are among the few who have directly addressed this topic. Of course, they give priority to feminine reading, and by this special treatment already present woman as a deviation from the norm (= man), as did the arguments used around 1800. Something else that is problematic about Schon's article is that his reconstruction of ways of reading is based solely on material that documents the debates on the reading craze and gender characteristics during the period in question. He thus chooses a genre of source material that includes primarily programmatic statements penned almost exclusively by men. The information contained in them regarding reading practices at that point in history should at least be viewed with the utmost caution. Thus, one will look in vain in his article for texts documenting the reading habits of real male and female readers that will corroborate the conclusions he draws based on this material: compared to men, he claims, women have less literary competence, read more atavistically, and satisfy their needs for fantasy more openly through reading. In my opinion, Schon's approach runs the risk of uncritically reproducing the contemporary discourse around the reading craze and gender, whose effectiveness for the social practice of reading first needs to be examined.

Related articles from newspapers, magazines, journals, and more
Torah of the Mothers: Contemporary Jewish Women Read Classical Jewish...
Magazine article from: Library Journal Christian, Graham March 1, 2001 700+ words
Torah of the Mothers: Contemporary Jewish Women Read Classical Jewish Texts. Lambda. 2000. c.510p. ed. by Ora Wiskind Elper & Susan Handelman. ISBN 965-7108-23...
Women read more direct mail than E-mail advertising.(FieldReports)
Magazine article from: Response February 1, 2007 700+ words
BALTIMORE -- A new study released by Vertis Communications has found that 85 percent of women between the ages of 25-44 read printed direct mail advertising, despite the increase of electronically distributed advertisements. The study also finds that 54 percent of women surveyed who have access to
Radical uppity women: read on.(body politic)(Excerpt)
Magazine article from: Herizons Rebick, Judy March 22, 2005 700+ words
When I graduated from McGill University in 1967, I wanted to be a journalist. [ILLUSTRATION OMITTED] Along with my male colleagues at the McGill Daily. I applied to a local radio station. "We don't hire girls in the newsroom," the station manager told me. "Why not?" I asked. "Because the men swear
What women read.(In Other News ...)
Magazine article from: Esquire October 1, 2005 700+ words
CALL US OLD-FASHIONED, but we're assuming you don't have a subscription to a women's magazine. We're also assuming you like women and would like to learn more about them. That's why we'll be giving you a monthly glimpse inside a current major women's magazine. Below, part of a story from October's
What women read.(MAN AT HIS BEST: In Other News ...)(Brief Article)
Magazine article from: Esquire March 1, 2006 700+ words
As part of our tireless war on cross-gender ignorance, we give you another page from a women's magazine currently on newsstands. This month, a sampling of Marie Claire's March photo essay, "How Other Women See Your Body," a portfolio by female photographers attempting to reimagine the womanly form
What women read.(fragrance advice for women from periodical Redbook)(Brief...
Magazine article from: Esquire December 1, 2005 700+ words
This month: a page from the current issue of Redbook, a magazine for "today's young, married woman," with a circulation of 2.4 million. "Emote Control" pairs ladies with a fragrance according to their favorite TV show. Frankly, we weren't sure what to feel when we realized its similarity to our own
What women read.(sex advice for women from periodical Cosmopolitan)(Brief...
Magazine article from: Esquire November 1, 2005 700+ words
As part of our continuing mission to close the gender gap, we present another page from a woman's magazine on the newsstands now: This month, Cosmopoliton, with a circulation of almost three million. In "Hot Sex Trends Worth Trying," the editors divulge "brilliant mattress moves every hot-blooded
What women read.(Maintenance)(Brief article)
Magazine article from: Esquire Cutler, Rodney May 1, 2006 700+ words
This month, we bring you the opening spread of "The Battle of the Bronzers," a four-page guide to the best self-tanning products, as featured in June's Shop Etc. (circulation 600,000). Vaguely reminiscent of Esquire's own fake-tan breakdown from November 2005 ("The Pale Man it reminds us that, just
Take control of stress this second: a recent Cosmo survey found that chronic...
Magazine article from: Cosmopolitan Colino, Stacey May 1, 2004 700+ words
By the end of any given week, 22-year-old Loralynne Dickey of Austin, Texas, feels like a train wreck. Between working 50 hours at her job as a public relations account coordinator, straggling to make ends meet financially, eating fast food on the run, and trying to eke out time to see friends, "I
Context still matters: some bloggers aren't so careful, particularly those with...
Magazine article from: EContent Crawford, Walt May 1, 2004 700+ words
...realize that Google News items from The Register should be read differently than items from, say, The Washington Post or Reuters...papers, to realize that Washington Times stories must be read differently than Post stories). But if you have selected an RSS feed...
For more facts and information, see all results

Source: HighBeam Research, Did women really read differently? A historical-empirical...

©2009 Gale, a part of Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.
About us | FAQs | Contact us | Privacy policy | Terms and conditions
Other Gale sites: Encyclopedia.com | HighBeam Research | Acquire Content | Books & Authors | Goliath | MovieRetriever | Smart QandA