AccessMyLibrary provides FREE access to over 30 million articles from top publications available through your library.

No U.S. Supreme Court ruling on same-sex marriage in Massachusetts.

The Boston Globe (Boston, MA)

| November 30, 2004 | COPYRIGHT 2004 The Boston Globe. This material is published under license from the publisher through the Gale Group, Farmington Hills, Michigan.  All inquiries regarding rights should be directed to the Gale Group. (Hide copyright information)Copyright

Byline: Yvonne Abraham

Nov. 30--The US Supreme Court declined yesterday to hear a challenge to same-sex marriages in Massachusetts, dealing a second setback to a group that has been trying to put a stop to those marriages since before they began in the state on May 17.

The justices were asked to overturn the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court ruling legalizing same-sex marriage, on the grounds that the seven justices of the state's highest court had exceeded their authority under the US Constitution and violated the principle of separation of powers by usurping the jurisdiction of the Legislature.

The US Supreme Court declined to consider the case, without comment. Lawyers on both sides said the court's refusal to take the case is no indicator of where judges in the nation's highest court stand on the issue of same-sex marriage.

Rather, legal specialists said, it reflects the court's reluctance to wade into the matter while it is still such a fresh source of controversy nationally. It also indicates that the arguments used by the plaintiffs in this case were weak, said Eugene Volokh, a professor of law at the University of California at Los Angeles.

"There are lots of reasons the Supreme Court could refuse to hear a case," said Volokh, who specializes in constitutional law. "However, in this case, it's pretty clear: The Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court decided that the Massachusetts Constitution mandates recognition of same-sex marriage, and the Massachusetts Constitution is the business of the Massachusetts courts. The US Supreme Court will not intervene on matters that have only to do with state law."

The court hears only about 80 of the more than 5,000 cases put before it each year.

Related articles from newspapers, magazines, journals, and more
FRC Applauds CA Supreme Court Same-Sex 'Marriage' Ruling; 'This is a sweeping...
Press release article from: PR Newswire August 12, 2004 700+ words
...Today the California Supreme Court ruled against San Francisco...with the California Supreme Court in this case. FRC...Today the California Supreme Court fulfilled their duty...Newsom to issue same-sex 'marriage' licenses were beyond...
U. Iowa: Iowa Supreme Court opens same-sex marriage case.
News wire article from: The America's Intelligence Wire December 9, 2008 700+ words
...the Iowa Supreme Court case that...on same-sex marriage. The two...family law. Supreme Court decisions...of same-sex marriage in other...the Iowa Supreme Court legalizes same-sex marriage, Taylor...
Hawaii Supreme Court Rejects 'Same-Sex Marriage,' Affirms Will of People, FRC...
Press release article from: PR Newswire December 10, 1999 700+ words
...constitution. The state Supreme Court, which precipitated...Thursday, the Hawaii Supreme Court upheld a 1994 ban on "same-sex marriage." Citing an...recognize "same-sex marriage," but the voters...hope the Vermont Supreme Court will protect the...
Government lawyers present case to Canadian Supreme Court for same-sex marriage...
News wire article from: The America's Intelligence Wire October 6, 2004 700+ words
...case before the Supreme Court of Canada on Wednesday...arguing that same-sex marriage should be supported...territories. Same-sex marriage legislation was referred to the Supreme Court last year by former...favor of same-sex marriage and the federal...
No U.S. Supreme Court ruling on same-sex marriage in Massachusetts.
News wire article from: Knight Ridder/Tribune Business News November 30, 2004 700+ words
...recognition of same-sex marriage, and the Massachusetts...courts. The US Supreme Court will not intervene...ensue," the Supreme Court was told in a...page brief. The Supreme Court denied that request...start of same-sex marriage in Massachusetts...
United Church to appear before Supreme Court in same-sex marriage hearing.
Magazine article from: Presbyterian Record June 1, 2004 700+ words
...right to intervene in the Supreme Court of Canada hearing on same-sex marriage scheduled for October...secular equality values, the Supreme Court needed to hear the perspective...church that sees same-sex marriage and opposite-sex couples...
Supreme Court supports same-sex marriage.(Canadian news)
Magazine article from: Presbyterian Record MacLachlan, Amy January 1, 2005 700+ words
...government has the right to legalize same-sex marriage, according to a unanimous ruling by the Supreme Court of Canada. The country's highest court...the first to rule in favour of same-sex marriage in June 2003. Since then British Columbia...
O'Melveny Files Amicus Brief in California Supreme Court in Same-Sex Marriage...
Press release article from: PR Newswire September 26, 2007 700+ words
...amicus brief in the California Supreme Court in support of the parties challenging...to be used by the California Supreme Court, arguing that California's...California's ban on same-sex marriage violates the rights of gays and...
Equality Forum Salutes Canadian Supreme Court Opinion on Same-Sex Marriage.
News wire article from: The America's Intelligence Wire December 9, 2004 700+ words
...appeal to the Supreme Court of Canada. Jean...supported same-sex marriage. Since the decision...provide same-sex marriage. "We salute this opinion by the Supreme Court of Canada. It...delay to same-sex marriage in Canada...
Jerry Brown, California's attorney general, thinks that the voters have...
Magazine article from: National Review January 26, 2009 700+ words
...thinks that the voters have approved an unconstitutional constitutional amendment. Last year the state supreme court foisted same-sex marriage on the state. The voters undid it. Brown's legal argument is that amendments cannot take away rights...
For more facts and information, see all results
©2009 Gale, a part of Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.
About us | FAQs | Contact us | Privacy policy | Terms and conditions
Other Gale sites: Encyclopedia.com | HighBeam Research | Acquire Content | Books & Authors | Goliath | MovieRetriever | Smart QandA