AccessMyLibrary provides FREE access to millions of articles from top publications available through your library.

Rival solutions smack down spam - MailFrontier, Sophos, Symantec, and Trend Micro deploy effective spam combatants.(Product/Service Evaluation)

InfoWorld

| September 27, 2004 | Harbaugh, Logan G. | COPYRIGHT 2003 InfoWorld Media Group, Inc. (Hide copyright information)Copyright

Spam is such a significant problem these days that even the federal government has gotten involved, passing legislation such as the CAN-SPAM Act. Meanwhile, a wide variety of companies has collaborated on an authentication scheme called the Sender ID Framework, aimed at making e- mail fraud even harder to perpetrate. Realistically, though, neither CAN-SPAM nor e-mail-sender authentication is likely to do much to stem the flood of mail. Fortunately, anti-spam products continue to evolve and improve.

In my ongoing tests of anti-spam products, I recently looked at four more contenders: Brightmail Anti-Spam 6.0 from Symantec; IMSS (InterScan Messaging Security Suite) Version 2.8 from Trend Micro; MailFrontier Enterprise Gateway 3.1 from MailFrontier; and PureMessage 4.6 from Sophos. They all performed admirably, filtering more than 90 percent of spam, with few false positives.

All are software gateways that can reside on the same system as your mail server or on a separate system. They all offer enterprise-caliber features, including user access to quarantined messages; automatic setup of user access to quarantined messages; different policies by user, group, or domain; optional anti-virus scanning; and useful reporting tools. Pricing for all four is within $1 per user, per year, for anti- spam, anti-virus, and policy filtering.

Beyond the basics, Brightmail offers a simple installation with almost no configuration or tuning required, and little ongoing maintenance is necessary. Trend Micro delivers extensive tuning capabilities that cater to the needs of varying groups of users. MailFrontier provides easy installation and great reporting. Sophos installs on Linux only, and it provides a great deal of flexibility as well as a relatively simple installation.

As for accuracy, Brightmail sets the standard for filtering performance, boasting zero false positives, critical or bulk, and stopping 97.69 percent of spam. With zero critical false positives, 1.26 percent bulk false positives, and 96 percent of spam stopped, Sophos will also keep end-users content. MailFrontier is also quite acceptable, with the spam- stopping score of 97.95 percent, three critical false positives out of 1,711 messages, and a bulk false positive rate of 0.94 percent. IMSS is still well within the acceptable range, with a bulk false positive rate of 0.6 percent, one critical …

Related articles from newspapers, magazines, journals, and more
Spam Fighting System generates no false positives.(Exchange Server Spam...
Magazine article from: Product News Network July 7, 2006 700+ words
Software detects spam with minimal false positives.(GFI's New Version of its...
Magazine article from: Product News Network April 27, 2005 700+ words
Outstanding Spam Capture Rate and Low False Positives With GFI...
News wire article from: Europe Intelligence Wire September 18, 2008 700+ words
Spam defenses get shot in the arm from Immunity 2.0 - Cloudmark software...
Magazine article from: InfoWorld Harbaugh, Logan G. April 11, 2005 700+ words
Appliances offer more than spam defense - Proofpoint, Symantec devices...
Magazine article from: InfoWorld Harbaugh, Logan G. January 9, 2006 700+ words
©2013 Gale, a part of Cengage Learning. All rights reserved. Contact us | Privacy policy | Terms and conditions

The AccessMyLibrary advertising network includes: womensforum.com GlamFamily