AccessMyLibrary provides FREE access to over 30 million articles from top publications available through your library.
Create a link to this page
Copy and paste this link tag into your Web page or blog:
ITEM: The San Jose Mercury News for July 19 editorialized that a compromise tobacco bill on Capitol Hill was probably the best legislation capable of passage. "So a deal in the Senate that is a hold-your-nose compromise for foes of smoking--and for friends of tobacco--might well represent as much progress as can be expected."
However, complained the paper; the Food and Drug Administration "will not be able to ban smoking or prohibit nicotine in tobacco products. It will be able to require a listing of ingredients, limit the location of vending machines, and require that magazine ads be printed only in black and white, among other things."
BETWEEN THE LINES: The various tobacco bills under consideration in Congress enhance federal powers or fund bigger government. Those favoring either the House or Senate variants prefer to disguise this by talking about other goals, such as public health or fairness to farmers. These are smoke screens.
Consider, for example, the House version with the buyout figure of $9.6 billion, paid by taxpayers (though the House later directed its negotiators to press for "private" financing in a conference committee with the Senate). Most potential recipients turn out not to be ...
Source: HighBeam Research, Behind the smoke screen.(Between The Lines)