AccessMyLibrary provides FREE access to over 30 million articles from top publications available through your library.

GOING NOWHERE.(the Muslim Brotherhood against the Mubarak regime in Egypt)

The New Yorker

| July 12, 2004 | Remnick, David | COPYRIGHT 2004 All rights reserved. Reproduced by permission of The Condé Nast Publications Inc. This material is published under license from the publisher through the Gale Group, Farmington Hills, Michigan.  All inquiries regarding rights should be directed to the Gale Group. (Hide copyright information)Copyright

Last November, President Bush delivered a speech at the National Endowment for Democracy, in Washington, spelling out the loftiest of his rationales for the war in Iraq--a determination to remake the political world from North Africa to the Arabian peninsula. It was a radical conservative's most radical address. The end of the twentieth century, Bush said, had marked "the swiftest advance of freedom in the twenty-five-hundred-year story of democracy," an advance that began with Portugal, Spain, and Greece more than thirty years ago, spread to South Korea and Taiwan, and then, finally, to South Africa and the entire Soviet imperium. By the President's accounting, there were forty democracies in the world in the early nineteen-seventies and a hundred and twenty by 2000. Never mind the reassertion of authoritarian regimes in Central Asia and elsewhere. For Bush, one region in particular remained stubbornly unfree. "Are the peoples of the Middle East somehow beyond the reach of liberty?" he asked. The United States, he declared, had "adopted a new policy, a forward strategy of freedom in the Middle East" that would depend on American "persistence and energy and idealism" but also on the Arab countries--not least, the most populous, powerful, and influential country in the region. "The great and proud nation of Egypt has shown the way toward peace in the Middle East," Bush said, "and now should show the way toward democracy in the Middle East."

The logic of that rhetorical instruction was not lost on the Egyptians: just as Anwar Sadat, a quarter-century earlier, had flown to Jerusalem to make peace with Israel, Hosni Mubarak, an unchallenged four-term President, a modern pharaoh, should take the equally bold step of creating a constitutional democracy, even at the risk of surrendering power. Egypt is historically central, a civilization of more than seven thousand years' standing, and, unlike the sectarian societies of Syria and Iraq or the arriviste dynastic oil depots of Saudi Arabia and Kuwait, it is a true nation-state, the center of nearly all currents, intellectual and ideological, in the Arab world. In Bush's own mind, at least, he was encouraging a revolution from above, an Arabian perestroika. And the revolution, he made plain, ought to begin in Cairo.

There has, of course, been no such revolution in Cairo, and no sign of one. Part of the collateral damage of the Bush Administration's prosecution of the war in Iraq is the erosion of American prestige and influence all over the world. Rather than take the democratizing cue from Bush, Mubarak's regime has offered itself as an example to the United States: Spare us the pretense of an open society, its leaders imply. Your greatest fear, like ours, is terrorism, and the only way to defeat such an enemy is by crushing it. Not long after September 11th, Atef Ebeid, the Egyptian Prime Minister, seemed to give sympathetic counsel to an ally still stunned by its encounter with the capacities of jihad. "The U.S. and U.K., including human-rights groups, have, in the past, been calling on us to give these terrorists their 'human rights,' " he said. "You can give them all the human rights they deserve until they kill you. After these horrible crimes committed in New York and Virginia, maybe Western countries should begin to think of Egypt's own fight against terror as their new model."

Ebeid was referring to a long history. Modern Islamic radicalism was born in the twenties in the villages of the upper Nile and the streets and mosques of Cairo. In communiques over the years, Osama bin Laden has often referred to that period as one of calamity and humiliation--an allusion, clear to anyone in the Islamic world, to the collapse of Islam's imperial seat, the Ottoman caliphate, based in Constantinople. In the nineteen-twenties, Kemal Ataturk, a secular revolutionary, banned the caliphate and established the Republic of Turkey. Islamic Constantinople became cosmopolitan Istanbul. At the same time, much of the Arab world was being parcelled out by the strongest powers in Europe, and nationalism came to displace the idea of a greater unified Islam.

In reaction, in 1928 Hassan al-Banna, a religiously educated teacher living near the Suez Canal, established the Muslim Brotherhood. Banna believed in Islam as a complete system, which provides divine instruction on everything from daily rituals, law, and politics to matters of the spirit, and to which all other forms of thought and social organization--secularism, nationalism, socialism, liberalism--are alien. In his essay "Between Yesterday and Today," Banna wrote that the colonialist Europeans had expropriated the resources of the Islamic lands and corrupted them with "their murderous germs":

They imported their half-naked women into these regions, together with their liquors, their theaters, their dance halls, their amusements, their stories, their newspapers, their novels, their whims, their silly games, and their vices. . . . The day must come when the castles of this materialistic civilization will be laid low upon the heads of their inhabitants.

The Brotherhood's slogan was, and remains, "God is our objective; the Koran is our constitution; the prophet is our leader; struggle is our way; and death for the sake of God is the highest of our aspirations." The Brotherhood, like many groups that bear its imprint decades later--Hamas, Hezbollah--established charitable organizations, clinics, schools, and underground paramilitary groups to further the cause of an Islamic polity. Initially, the spectacularly corrupt Egyptian king, Farouk, used the Brotherhood as a stabilizing force against a stronger opposition, the Communists and the secular nationalists. And, as the Brotherhood grew in membership, it was able to act with a degree of freedom. But when terrorist challenges to the monarchy began, the government came to see the Brotherhood as a real threat. At the end of 1948, a member of the Brotherhood assassinated Prime Minister Mahmud Fahmi Nuqrashi; in 1949, the secret police retaliated, shooting Hassan al-Banna dead as he was getting into a taxi in Cairo.

Related articles from newspapers, magazines, journals, and more
Female Islamist eyes Egyptian parliament seat; Woman flaunts ties to banned...
Newspaper article from: The Washington Times October 19, 2005 700+ words
...affiliation - with the banned Muslim Brotherhood - is no secret. At her headquarters...in a recent interview. The Muslim Brotherhood, founded in Egypt in 1928...emulated in other countries in the Middle East, has been banned here since...
Middle East tension.(negotiations for West Bank self-rule continues; and other...
Magazine article from: The Economist (US) July 22, 1995 700+ words
...for the Liberation of Palestine. Egypt continued its comprehensive crackdown on non-militant members of the Muslim Brotherhood, arresting several ex-members of parliament, professional men and a senior official from al-Azhar university...
Squeezing Islam's moderates. (Egypt's moderate Muslim Brotherhood opposition...
Magazine article from: The Middle East June 1, 1993 700+ words
...resignation, by the Muslim Brotherhood's spokesman...described to The Middle East in near apocalyptic...technically banned, the Muslim Brotherhood has come to represent...leadership of the Muslim Brotherhood remains committed...
Egypt's opposition targets reforms; Muslim Brotherhood members, Parliament's...
Newspaper article from: The Christian Science Monitor March 23, 2006 700+ words
...the fundamentalist Muslim Brotherhood party, lashed out...person bloc of Muslim Brotherhood members elected...movements across the Middle East gaining political...spotlight is on the Muslim Brotherhood to see how this...
Muslim Brotherhood could pose threat to Egyptian regime.
Newspaper article from: Knight Ridder/Tribune News Service McDonald, Mark December 14, 2002 700+ words
...Egypt _ The Muslim Brotherhood, the grandfather...rhetoric, the Muslim Brotherhood represents...domination of the Middle East. Although...throughout the Middle East. "The government...founded on Muslim Brotherhood's principles...
Muslim Brotherhood could pose threat to U.S.
Newspaper article from: Knight Ridder/Tribune News Service McDonald, Mark December 13, 2002 700+ words
...Egypt _ The Muslim Brotherhood, the grandfather...rhetoric, the Muslim Brotherhood represents...domination of the Middle East. Although...throughout the Middle East. "The government...founded on Muslim Brotherhood's principles...
Legalizing the Muslim Brotherhood.(EDITORIAL)(Editorial)
Newspaper article from: The Christian Science Monitor November 23, 2005 700+ words
...let in the Muslim Brotherhood - a popular...applied to the Middle East is full of...risk from the Muslim Brotherhood is that if...quo in the Middle East is also a risk...fears of the Muslim Brotherhood are overblown...
JORDAN: MUSLIM BROTHERHOOD MAY CHALLENGE PUBLIC GATHERINGS LAW.(Brief Article)
Newspaper article from: IPR Strategic Business Information Database July 30, 2002 700+ words
...According to "Jordan Times", the Muslim Brotherhood said the government had denied...support for the Palestinians. Muslim Brotherhood leader Abdul Majid Thneibat told...fine. (Source: Info-Prod (Middle East) Ltd.)
For more facts and information, see all results
©2009 Gale, a part of Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.
About us | FAQs | Contact us | Privacy policy | Terms and conditions
Other Gale sites: Encyclopedia.com | HighBeam Research | Acquire Content | Books & Authors | Goliath | MovieRetriever | Smart QandA