AccessMyLibrary provides FREE access to millions of articles from top publications available through your library.

Auftragstaktik and disorder in battle: learning to "see the battlefield" differently.

The Army Doctrine and Training Bulletin (French edition)

| June 22, 2001 | Oliviero, Chuck | COPYRIGHT 2001 Canadian Army Journal. (Hide copyright information)Copyright

Most visions of future battlefields are referred to as "chaotic". If Henri de Jomini's belief that war really is a "violent, and an impassioned drama," and Carl von Clausewitz's concepts of "chaos and friction" are correct, then it would seem to me that too many leaders tend to see the battlefield incorrectly, or at least unrealistically. What I mean is that most of us either willingly or, unwillingly through drills, attempt to bring order to something, which is inherently disorderly and chaotic. Would it not be better to learn to live within this disorder? If battle is already chaotic, then why not abandon any attempts to bring order and strive to bring even more disorder to the situation? Before investigating this issue further, we need to review some history.

As Owl likes to remind Pooh, "It is always best to begin at the beginning." The entire history of the development of Auftragstaktik revolved around one simple question: How did the Prussian Army view warfare? All other issues, however interesting or important, are secondary to this pivotal, philosophical question. From an intellectual perspective, the simple answer was what Colonel Trevor Dupuy called the institutionalization of chaos in battle. (1) This concept encapsulated all aspects of Kriegskunst, (2) from General August von Gneisenau's Auftragstaktik to General Gerhard von Scharnhorst's Generalstab to General Helmuth von Moltke's minimalist approach to orders, "nicht mehr befehlen als durchaus notig ..." (3) The conviction that war was a violent, irrational, and uncontrollable human activity was, and remains to this day, the most identifiable embodiment of the Prusso-German school of war. (4) While other armies strove to bring paradesquare order to the battlefield, the Prussian Army ensconced the Clausewitzian concepts of the fog of war, friction and chaos into its tactical doctrine.

This is not to say that Prussian tactics were chaotic. On the contrary, the use of rigid discipline and effective battle drills gave Prussian commanders at all levels the potential to exploit the changing face of battle. The great paradox of Prussian discipline was that precision drill and unquestioning obedience could instil initiative and independence at all levels, from infantry …

Related articles from newspapers, magazines, journals, and more
Frederick still rules in Germany.(TELEVISION)(television series about...
Magazine article from: Variety Meza, Ed August 3, 2009 700+ words
The Wars of Frederick the Great.
Magazine article from: The English Historical Review Black, Jeremy February 1, 1998 700+ words
Airmen and Mission Command
Magazine article from: Air & Space Power Journal Harvard, James W. March 1, 2013 700+ words
Let Us Now Praise Great Men.(role of individuals in international relations)
Magazine article from: International Security Byman, Daniel L. March 22, 2001 700+ words
The politics of military recruitment in eighteenth-century Germany.
Magazine article from: The English Historical Review Wilson, Peter H. June 1, 2002 700+ words
©2013 Gale, a part of Cengage Learning. All rights reserved. Contact us | Privacy policy | Terms and conditions

The AccessMyLibrary advertising network includes: womensforum.com GlamFamily