AccessMyLibrary provides FREE access to over 30 million articles from top publications available through your library.
Create a link to this page
Copy and paste this link tag into your Web page or blog:
For nearly two years, THE NEW AMERICAN has pointed out that Washington had detailed, specific advance warnings of the 9-11 attack--warnings that, if acted on, would have prevented the tragedy. (See our cover stories "Did We Know What Was Coming?" and "Foreknowledge and Failure" in our March 11, 2002 and June 17, 2002 issues, respectively.) Disclosures triggered by the bipartisan National Commission on Terrorist Attacks Upon the United States have now confirmed our conclusions.
According to the GovExec.com news service's daily briefing of March 24: "The U.S. intelligence community received a flood of threat warnings in the summer of 2001 that 'spectacular' terrorist attacks were likely, but conflicts about how to react rose between new Bush administration officials and officials held over from the Clinton administration...."
"I don't understand why we didn't put an order out, get everything the FBI had in and try to determine whether or not it was possible an attack was going to occur in the ...
Source: HighBeam Research, 9-11: we knew.(Insider Report)