AccessMyLibrary provides FREE access to over 30 million articles from top publications available through your library.
Create a link to this page
Copy and paste this link tag into your Web page or blog:
Trade: The president this week reportedly will lift most of the tariffs he levied on imported steel. It's a good move -- but one he should not have had to make.
President Bush should have never placed tariffs on imported steel. Trade restrictions always have harmful economic effects. The protected industry may benefit, but the damage trickles to other industries, especially those that use steel.
Jack Kemp wrote on this page just last week that the tariffs cost steel users about $600 million in lost profits and U.S. workers roughly 26,000 jobs.
And for what? The tariffs, subsequently ruled illegal by the World Trade Organization, saved maybe 5,000 jobs in the highly unionized steel industry.
The damage of tariffs is never restricted to one country. It spreads across the world when the retaliatory tariffs begin to fly.
The European Union, in this instance, is scheduled to impose $2.2 billion in sanctions on goods exported from the U.S. as soon as Dec. 15 in response to the Bush steel tariffs.
Retaliation from Japan would probably not be far behind.